> if (rx_status.freq != data2->channel->center_freq &&
> (!data2->tmp_chan ||
> rx_status.freq != data2->tmp_chan->center_freq)) {
Perfect, thank you!
Adam
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+{��*ޕ�,�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v��
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 19:30 +, Adam R. Welle wrote:
> > Applied. I added locking and made a change to accept both the off-
> > channel and non-offchannel since the internal datapath also does
> > that
> > and we don't stop other operation for off-channel.
>
> Does your change only throw away p
> Applied. I added locking and made a change to accept both the off-
> channel and non-offchannel since the internal datapath also does that
> and we don't stop other operation for off-channel.
Does your change only throw away packets when tmp_chan is set? I was under
the impression that most of t
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 17:13 -0500, arwe...@cert.org wrote:
> From: Adam Welle
>
> If a packet is received from netlink with the frequency value set it
> is
> checked against the current radio's frequency and discarded if
> different.
> The frequency is also checked against data2->tmp_chan if non-
