Johannes Berg writes:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16:47 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> I suppose that could be a way to do it (i.e. have
>> ieee80211_tx_dequeue call all the TX hooks etc), but am not sure
>> whether there would be problems doing all this work in the loop
>> that's buildi
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16:47 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> I suppose that could be a way to do it (i.e. have
> ieee80211_tx_dequeue call all the TX hooks etc), but am not sure
> whether there would be problems doing all this work in the loop
> that's building aggregates (which is what wo
Johannes Berg writes:
>> well, we're getting there. the results of both patch attempts were
>> really nice, and brought encrypted performance with fq back into line
>> with unencrypted. Still running crypted tests as I write...
>>
>> So fixing TKIP would be next, forcing the AP to use that? What
> well, we're getting there. the results of both patch attempts were
> really nice, and brought encrypted performance with fq back into line
> with unencrypted. Still running crypted tests as I write...
>
> So fixing TKIP would be next, forcing the AP to use that? What other
> scenarios do we hav
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Johannes Berg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You need to work on coding style, a lot of your indentation is
> completely messed up.
>
>> + switch (sdata->vif.type) {
>> + case NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION:
>> + if (sdata->u.mgd.use_4addr) {
>> +
