Re: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects

2016-09-19 Thread Johannes Berg
> > I take that back. I think it's leaking memory - my tests never used > > to run out of memory, but now they eventually do. > > > I'll try to figure out more. > > Interesting.  The kernel test robot found a bug in the insertion > slowpath where we end up inserting without taking the inner spin

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects

2016-09-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:25:18AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Yes, it's passing all the wpa_supplicant tests, so > > > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg > > > > I take that back. I think it's leaking memory - my tests never used to > run out of memory, but now they eventually do. > > I'll try

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects

2016-09-19 Thread Johannes Berg
> OK, it's finally ready now. > > This series contains one two patches.  The first adds the rhlist > interface and the second converts mac80211 to use it.  If this works > out I'll then proceed to convert the other insecure_elasticity > users over to this. Thanks a lot Herbert! > I've tested th

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects

2016-09-19 Thread Johannes Berg
> Yes, it's passing all the wpa_supplicant tests, so > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg > I take that back. I think it's leaking memory - my tests never used to run out of memory, but now they eventually do. I'll try to figure out more. johannes