Thanks for the fixups!
These are now merged.
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto][v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] sched/core:
Fix CPU offline/online process
on 16/11/2020 Daniel Dragomir wrote:
> From: Daniel Dragomir
>
> This error was introduced in commit d02636e8d3 ("Merge branch
> 'v4.
These are now merged to v5.2/*
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto] [v5.2/standard/base][PATCH 1/3] kdb: Eliminate
strncpy() warnings by replacing with strscpy()
on 15/11/2020 wenlin.k...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Daniel Thompson
>
> commit d228bee8201a7ea77c414f1298b2f572f42c6113 upstream
>
>
I forgot to ask with the v5.2 versions of these changes, what is the upstream
status of these patches ?
If they are cherry-picks/backports, we should be logging the commit ID in
the patches themselves.
If they are custom patches, a note indicating if they've been submitted
upstream should be adde
merged.
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto][v5.4/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH] net:
axienet: Remove static from __axienet_device_reset
on 16/11/2020 He Zhe wrote:
> __axienet_device_reset is referenced from different source files.
>
> Fixes: 59b0ea17cf64 ("net: axienet: Add missing return
merged.
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/nxp-s32g2xx][PATCH]
s32gen1: pcie: Remove duplicate interrupt resource request
on 16/11/2020 Xulin Sun wrote:
> This fixes the below kmemleak call trace:
>
> unreferenced object 0xff88784d5980 (size 128):
> comm "swapper/0"
In message: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache master PATCH] meta: Add
CONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM to 8250.cfg
on 16/11/2020 Vasyl Vavrychuk wrote:
> On some embedded systems 8250 compatible serial ports meant to be
> defined in devicetree. Config SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM enables probing of
> them.
This
In message: [linux-yocto]: [kernel v5.4/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi]: bcm-2xxx-rpi:
upgrade patches for raspberrypi 4b platform
on 18/11/2020 meng...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Limeng
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> There are some new patches merged into upstream raspberrypi sdk kernel,
> branch rpi-5.4.y.
> S
On 2020/11/19 下午11:24, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
[Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
I forgot to ask with the v5.2 versions of these changes, what is the upstream
status of these patches ?
If they are cherry-picks/backports, we should be logging the commit ID in
the patches