| 6 ++
> bsp/qemuriscv64/qemuriscv64.cfg | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
Acked-by: Richard Purdie
This solves a number of problems we're having on the autobuilder.
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply On
On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 21:12 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:23, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > I won't repeat what others have already said, but just to be clear, the
> > kernel config for a platform is 100% independent from having "a rich
> > command line experience"
> >
On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 16:30 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:58, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, not everything is a module. As to your "so what if the
> > existing machines enable everything under the sun and install it onto
> > the image" -- well obviously
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 22:05 +0530, Pintu Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This question is related to Yocto Dunfell specifically.
>
> I have certain distro features defined (by default) in our distro
> include/conf file.
> These distro features are required for certain machines and should not
> be
We've been having bandwidth trouble with downloads.yoctoproject.org so we did
some quick analysis to see what the issue is. Basically in speeding up the
server which was the rate limit, we hit the limits of the hosting pipe. I'd note
a few things:
a) it isn't the sstate mirroring, it is nearly
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 12:39 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> By default the -dev kernel uses the "AUTOREV" to pull in the branch
> head as the revision. Some of our BSPs are based on the -dev kernel and
> we choose to nail down the kernel to a specific revision when releasing
> our product by using some
On Wed, 2021-06-02 at 23:12 -0700, lavkhush2...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello Guys
> i am building nodejs-12.21.0, facing an issue- ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES
> 'nodejs' nodejs was skipped:
> incompatible with host riscv64-oe-linux (not in COMPATIBLE_HOST)
>
> After modification in .bb file:-
>
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 21:44 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH RFC 00/21] Git repository sharing for kernel (and other) repos]
> On 02/04/2021 (Fri 23:14) Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
&
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> If a clone in the download directory is not static, and was created with
> single-branch to avoid additonal unwanted content, then the fetcher will
> come along and spoil that effort by unconditonally getting refs/* from
> the server and
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Next Steps:
> ---
> With this being a functional implementation, it seems like a good time to
> get other people looking at it. Ideally step #1 will be getting general
> agreement that this is something we need, something that is
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 08:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> This needs to go to oe-core.
>
> But see some comments below.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:26 AM wrote:
> > From: Zhang Qiang
> >
> > When compiling xilinx-zynq board linux-kernel-dev(v5.8) if
> > "GCC_PLUGINS=y", The following error
11 matches
Mail list logo
