On 2016-07-28 8:28 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
This pull-request reverts one of the audio patches recently submitted
for the standard/intel/bxt-rebase branch. The patch in question is a
fix-up patch for another patch that is not yet included. The result is
that a non-existent structure member is
This pull-request reverts one of the audio patches recently submitted
for the standard/intel/bxt-rebase branch. The patch in question is a
fix-up patch for another patch that is not yet included. The result is
that a non-existent structure member is referenced, causing a
compilation error
Hello,
I don’t know if it’s ok to send this email.
I just meet a simple problem, and I try every method but i still can’t
solve it.
I download yocto from http://freescale.github.io/ , and build
core-image-base.
MACHINE=imx6ulevk source setup-environment imx6ul
On 2016-07-28 12:49 AM, Yong Li wrote:
Dear Maintainers,
This patch file enables more popular iio sensor drivers as kernel modules,
users can test these external i2c sensors more easily.
Since they are modules and not built-in, it looks fine to me
Please merge it into yocto-4.4 branch if
On 2016-07-28 12:00 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote:
Hi,
I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto
release, can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto
uses the LTSI kernel, may I know if this is still the case?
I was about to describe the process .. but
Hi,
I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto release,
can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto uses the LTSI
kernel, may I know if this is still the case?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
--
___
linux-yocto
