On 2017-07-27 6:06 PM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 07/26/2017 06:21 PM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
Hey Bruce,
So I completely agree with you, and I think we should keep them
modules/kernel size as small as we can,
but I just had a meeting
On 07/27/2017 12:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 07/26/2017 06:21 PM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
Hey Bruce,
So I completely agree with you, and I think we should keep them
modules/kernel size as small as we can,
but I just had a meeting with the QA team and discussed this, it does
look
On 07/26/2017 06:21 PM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
Hey Bruce,
So I completely agree with you, and I think we should keep them
modules/kernel size as small as we can,
but I just had a meeting with the QA team and discussed this, it does
look like it'd be necessary to have those
modules
Hey Bruce,
So I completely agree with you, and I think we should keep them
modules/kernel size as small as we can,
but I just had a meeting with the QA team and discussed this, it does
look like it'd be necessary to have those
modules built for everyone, since they are not building images
No real objections to the series, but it will of course increase the
amount of modules/kernel size out of the box. I'm continually
balancing the built-in convenience versus the size of the kernel
and need to always ask the following question:
This sort of thing can be added via KERNEL_FEATURES
QA needs USB OTG to automate some of the testing processes,
this patch adds it to genericx86-64 builds
[YOCTO #11740]
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez
---
bsp/common-pc-64/common-pc-64.scc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git