Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] ieee802154 slave mac addr

2009-12-02 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hi, On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Pierre-emmanuel Goudet wrote: > Hi all >>> >>> Yes. We've started implementation of such driver for at86rf230/rf231 - >>> the >>> chip from Atmel that can do auto ACK, CSMA-CA, etc. It's not in the >>> public tree yet, as we haven't yet finished the interface b

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] izcoordinator fails to set_channel

2009-12-02 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Hennerich, Michael wrote: >>From: Hennerich, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>Current 802154mac device implementation only set_channel in the xmit >>path. >>Starting the izcoordinator doesn't involve any xmit action. >> >>My assumption would be tha

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] izcoordinator fails to set_channel

2009-12-02 Thread Hennerich, Michael
>From: Hennerich, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] > >Current 802154mac device implementation only set_channel in the xmit >path. >Starting the izcoordinator doesn't involve any xmit action. > >My assumption would be that as soon as the net_device is opened >the device is able to recei

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] ieee802154 slave mac addr

2009-12-02 Thread Pierre-emmanuel Goudet
Hi all >> Yes. We've started implementation of such driver for at86rf230/rf231 - >> the >> chip from Atmel that can do auto ACK, CSMA-CA, etc. It's not in the >> public tree yet, as we haven't yet finished the interface between >> mac802154 >> and such drivers. >> > > I'm very interested in th

[Linux-zigbee-devel] izcoordinator fails to set_channel

2009-12-02 Thread Hennerich, Michael
Current 802154mac device implementation only set_channel in the xmit path. Starting the izcoordinator doesn't involve any xmit action. My assumption would be that as soon as the net_device is opened the device is able to receive packets on an defined channel. Since the device that hosts the coord