Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] patchwork for this list

2011-06-20 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 17:50, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:27, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > > > To ease somehow patch-related tasks, I've installed patchwork system at > > http://patchwork.lumag.spb.ru/. Currently it contains all of the patches > > ever circul

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] patchwork for this list

2011-06-20 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:27, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > To ease somehow patch-related tasks, I've installed patchwork system at > http://patchwork.lumag.spb.ru/. Currently it contains all of the patches > ever circulated on this list. I've moved some of older patches to > 'Accep

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] at86rf230: possible issues with RX_SAFE_MODE

2011-06-20 Thread Werner Almesberger
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > I think Alexander also has added static buffer protection, which should > help exactly in this case. Oh, nice ! I hadn't spotted this feature. Yes, it works perfectly. Sorry for the false alarm. I'm still curious about setting RX_SAFE_MODE, though. I don't see the

[Linux-zigbee-devel] patchwork for this list

2011-06-20 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hello, colleagues, To ease somehow patch-related tasks, I've installed patchwork system at http://patchwork.lumag.spb.ru/. Currently it contains all of the patches ever circulated on this list. I've moved some of older patches to 'Accepted', but full cleanup is still pending. You can help us by

[Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH] make responsible callback more flexible

2011-06-20 Thread Alexander Smirnov
Hi all, this patch allows to process several response statuses and execute specified handlers. Currently it's used in active scanning when you may receive a beacon or end_of_scan signals. Thank you, Alexander From 8516cb53c66ba883da9ceb30146479728d097cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander S

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH 3/3] at86rf230: straighten out RX vs. TX synchronization

2011-06-20 Thread Alexander Smirnov
Hi Werner, thanks again for your patch, please find my comments below in the text. 2011/6/18 Werner Almesberger > The is_tx flag did not protect adequately against races when switching > from receiving to transmitting. This patch removes the unnecessary > spinlock and enforces proper synchroniz

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] at86rf230: possible issues with RX_SAFE_MODE

2011-06-20 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hello, On 6/20/11, Werner Almesberger wrote: > I wrote: >> A way to avoid this should be to retrieve the PHR with an SRAM >> read and to use the frame buffer read only for the payload. > > Hmm no, that doesn't work either. SRAM read can't retrieve the PHR :-( > > I've now verified that, if pa

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] at86rf230: possible issues with RX_SAFE_MODE

2011-06-20 Thread Werner Almesberger
I wrote: > A way to avoid this should be to retrieve the PHR with an SRAM > read and to use the frame buffer read only for the payload. Hmm no, that doesn't work either. SRAM read can't retrieve the PHR :-( I've now verified that, if packet reception is followed by a frame buffer read, a paus