Hi Stephen,
> It's now built as a separate utility module, and enabling BT selects
> that module in Kconfig. This fixes:
>
> net/ieee802154/built-in.o:(___ksymtab_gpl+lowpan_process_data+0x0): multiple
> definition of `__ksymtab_lowpan_process_data'
> net/bluetooth/built-in.o:(___ksymtab_gpl+low
ile hack there.
>> David, Marcel, could you please consider the attached patch.
>
> I think you forgot to "git add net/bluetooth/Makefile" into that patch;
> don't you need the following too (I certainly do, to build next-20140117)
>
>> diff --git a/net/bluetoot
From: Stephen Warren
It's now built as a separate utility module, and enabling BT selects
that module in Kconfig. This fixes:
net/ieee802154/built-in.o:(___ksymtab_gpl+lowpan_process_data+0x0): multiple
definition of `__ksymtab_lowpan_process_data'
net/bluetooth/built-in.o:(___ksymtab_gpl+lowpa
in.o: In function `bt_6lowpan_recv':
>> (.text+0x166b3c): undefined reference to `lowpan_process_data'
>
> Ah, nice Makefile hack there.
> David, Marcel, could you please consider the attached patch.
I think you forgot to "git add net/bluetooth/Makefile" into that
27;:
>>> 6lowpan.c:(.text+0x166149): undefined reference to `lowpan_header_compress'
>>> net/built-in.o: In function `bt_6lowpan_recv':
>>> (.text+0x166b3c): undefined reference to `lowpan_process_data'
>>
>> Ah, nice Makefile hack there.
>&g
On 01/17/2014 11:29 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> It's now built as a separate utility module, and enabling BT selects
> that module in Kconfig. This fixes:
>
> net/ieee802154/built-in.o:(___ksymtab_gpl+lowpan_process_data+0x0): multiple
> definition of `__ksymtab_lowpan_
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 02:54:56 +0400
> David, Marcel, could you please consider the attached patch.
Applied, thanks Dmitry.
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
L
in.o: In function `bt_6lowpan_recv':
>> (.text+0x166b3c): undefined reference to `lowpan_process_data'
>
> Ah, nice Makefile hack there.
> David, Marcel, could you please consider the attached patch.
>
>
Hi,
I guess that the Makefile hack is still causing problems
