On 5 March 2012 00:31, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>>
>>> Prajosh, Felix. Thank
> cc2530, mc13224 and stm32w are all in common use. They don't cost that
> much more than the non-SOC chips.
True. But the fact is that there are plenty of non-SOC chips in the
market too and a good implementation (good == widely adopted and used)
should cater to both. In this regard, I guess the
On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Summary on all the patchset below.
>
> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
> don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting your work.
> There are some coding standards. There are some ideas behi
Hi,
> BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips having ACK/filter MAC acceleration. Does
> Atmel have a chip with support for beaconing or beaconed networks?
You are right, they both support auto ACK, CSMA-CA, retries and
address filtering. They do support beacon-enabled networks in that
they can send ou
On 3 March 2012 02:48, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> Guys, I'd like to join the foray too :)
>>
>>> I'm sorry but your suggestions make nearly no sense. The current design
>>> is targeted di
Guys, I'd like to join the foray too :)
> I'm sorry but your suggestions make nearly no sense. The current design
> is targeted different applications and different types of interfaces which
> can be bound to each radio.
Ability to bind different types of interfaces to the same radio is
desirable.
