Hi,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Pierre-emmanuel Goudet
wrote:
> Hi all
>>>
>>> Yes. We've started implementation of such driver for at86rf230/rf231 -
>>> the
>>> chip from Atmel that can do auto ACK, CSMA-CA, etc. It's not in the
>>> public tree yet, as we haven't yet finished the interface b
Hi all
>> Yes. We've started implementation of such driver for at86rf230/rf231 -
>> the
>> chip from Atmel that can do auto ACK, CSMA-CA, etc. It's not in the
>> public tree yet, as we haven't yet finished the interface between
>> mac802154
>> and such drivers.
>>
>
> I'm very interested in th
>From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:[email protected]]
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Hennerich, Michael
> wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful if netdev->dev_addr could be specified in the
>>>phy driver?
>>>
>>>That may make sense. However we are trying to make phy drivers support
>>>several
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Hennerich, Michael
wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be useful if netdev->dev_addr could be specified in the
>>phy driver?
>>
>>That may make sense. However we are trying to make phy drivers support
>>several
>>MAC interfaces with different dev addresses on a single radio.
>
Hi Dmitry,
>From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:[email protected]]
>Hi,
>
>2009/12/1 Hennerich, Michael :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I wonder what is the proposed way to set the ieee802154 slave mac
>addr?
>> Looks like it can be only set by net_device_ops?
>> My version of ifconfig won't let me.
>
>Th
Hi,
2009/12/1 Hennerich, Michael :
> Hi All,
>
> I wonder what is the proposed way to set the ieee802154 slave mac addr?
> Looks like it can be only set by net_device_ops?
> My version of ifconfig won't let me.
Thank you for your interest!
The address will be settable via iz tool in the future.
Hi All,
I wonder what is the proposed way to set the ieee802154 slave mac addr?
Looks like it can be only set by net_device_ops?
My version of ifconfig won't let me.
Wouldn't it be useful if netdev->dev_addr could be specified in the phy driver?
-Michael
