On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> I hope to get mc13224v board RSN (on Monday-Tuesday). It's a custom
> board but according to the author it should be compatible with
> Freescale's USB sniffer dongle. However it will take some time for me
> to get in touch with it.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:56:19PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:25:23PM -0500
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:56:19PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> >> Why don't these look like 802.1
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:56:19PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> >> Why don't these look like 802.15.4 packets in wireshark?
> >> >
> >> > Do you use our patched wiresha
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> Why don't these look like 802.15.4 packets in wireshark?
>> >
>> > Do you use our patched wireshark? We've had to put some minor code
>> > changes there.
>>
>> Where ar
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:07:28PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I unloaded the modules and repeated everything. It worked correctly this time.
Glad to hear this!
> Something failed the first time when setting the MAC addresses.
> Running wpan1 and wpan2 both with a MAC address of zero messed
> every
>> Why don't these look like 802.15.4 packets in wireshark?
>
> Do you use our patched wireshark? We've had to put some minor code
> changes there.
Where are the changes you made, I don't see a diff in the git tree. I
already have some patches in my wireshark.
I'm able to sniff and decode 802.15.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> Why don't these look like 802.15.4 packets in wireshark?
> >
> > Do you use our patched wireshark? We've had to put some minor code
> > changes there.
>
> Where are the changes you made, I don't see a diff in the git tree. I
> already
I unloaded the modules and repeated everything. It worked correctly this time.
Something failed the first time when setting the MAC addresses.
Running wpan1 and wpan2 both with a MAC address of zero messed
everything up. I may have messed up setting them. iz assoc should
probably error out on a MA
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 04:20:11PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Both of my wpans send back the same address:
>
> r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan1 777 1 11 short
> Received short address 8001, status 00
> r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan2 777 1 11 short
> Rec
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Both of my wpans send back the same address:
>
> r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan1 777 1 11 short
> Received short address 8001, status 00
> r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan2 777 1 11 short
> Received shor
Both of my wpans send back the same address:
r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan1 777 1 11 short
Received short address 8001, status 00
r...@terra:/home/apps/linux-zigbee/src# iz assoc wpan2 777 1 11 short
Received short address 8001, status 00
Missing a '4' here...
echo 1 > /sy
12 matches
Mail list logo
