Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-15 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
On 12/14/2011 09:35 AM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools > compile I've pushed an (compile-tested-only) port of lowpan-tools to libnl3. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Peter Naulls > wrote: > > >

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread [email protected]
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 03:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >>> >>>

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread Peter Naulls
On 12/14/2011 03:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls > wrote: >> On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >>> >> >> No, I don't know that. I don't know what this means. That's >> why I as

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread [email protected]
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >> > > No, I don't know that.  I don't know what this means.  That's > why I asked my questions in the first place.  All I know > is that th

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread Peter Naulls
On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: > You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? > No, I don't know that. I don't know what this means. That's why I asked my questions in the first place. All I know is that there's a bunch of tools that relate to zigbee, and incidentally, t

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread [email protected]
You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 01:39 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> > already. >> >> And what makes you think anyone here _must_ provide you with this >> information? Nobody here has a support contract

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread Peter Naulls
On 12/14/2011 01:39 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > already. > > And what makes you think anyone here _must_ provide you with this > information? Nobody here has a support contract with you. There was no must. I'm asking. You're under no obligation to respond. But if I don't get a straight

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 09:28, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/13/2011 09:35 PM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools > > compile > > Well, obviously. I said nearly as much in my post. But that doesn't > answer my question, which wa

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-14 Thread Peter Naulls
On 12/13/2011 09:35 PM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools compile Well, obviously. I said nearly as much in my post. But that doesn't answer my question, which was if patches to later libnl exist for the tools. Downgrading the versi

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

2011-12-13 Thread Prajosh Premdas
the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools compile On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Peter Naulls wrote: > > Hi guys, I'm looking at Zigbee options for Linux. In practical > terms, there seems to be this project and the stuff done by > EmberZNet. > > My most immediate