On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> I looked at the official x86emu code at
> ftp://ftp.scitechsoft.com/devel/x86emu/x86emu-0.8.tar.gz
I wonder if my bug fixes ever made it in. They had some "issues" (well,
bugs) with prefix 0x66 instruction parsing.
hmm.
> This contains something p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm interested. I assume this CLI is running as part of linux? Or is it
> the pre-linux stuff?
Presently, the CLI is running as part of the kernel - not as a seperate
userland application (the reasoning being that we can use the kernel's driver
ar
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Niki Waibel wrote:
> does that 2001 fit into a DIP socket?
DIP32
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
ron minnich wrote:
we can't use that code, however, or some idiot will decide to sue.
we don't ever use code based on disassembly.
I understand, although they would lose the suit (Sony v. Connectix and
related cases), it is not the kind of trouble we need. Would that idiot
be named SCO?
I a
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Adam Agnew wrote:
>
> Did you have the same winbond with award firmware? I'd be interested to
> learn if you found a way to work through that.
what is that all about? I am confused by the concept.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[E
5 matches
Mail list logo
