Re: Re: LinuxBIOS....on desktop PCs?

2004-02-11 Thread ron minnich
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >turns out the chaintech just added doesn't build, which I forget. Anyone > >wants to take a look, please do. > > Ah...well, maybe later then? Or maybe when I get a nice embedded linux > rackmount server to replace my Linksys router, and act as a w

Re: LinuxBIOS....on desktop PCs?

2004-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:10:55AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > there is a variant epia mobo which would make an ideal > router/filter/whatever, it has two enet ports. Do you know the LinuxBIOS status on it? Is it different from plain EPIA? I'm going to use it (it's the EPIA-CL) for a project in

Re: 64MB MMIO Hole ?

2004-02-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10 Feb 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > > The linux mtrr support does not know how to cope with overlapping > > mtrrs. > > should we help them? Writing the patch and submitting it sounds like one good solution. There is also PAT which will le

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040211 16:22]: > > I can't think of anything better. My wish list is to try to remove > > GNU-isms so I can build this on Plan 9, but at the same time we keep > > hitting these issues. > > > > If we are determined

device tree

2004-02-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Hi, what's the right way of getting the pci ids of a device when traversing the device tree? is seems that the "path" part can be used, but there's no reference to the real hardware. I need this only _after_ pci initialization. The config tool creates the following structure for an 8131 for ex

Re: LinuxBIOS....on desktop PCs?

2004-02-11 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Peter Stuge wrote: > Do you know the LinuxBIOS status on it? Is it different from plain EPIA? it's the 6000 I think, a variant of the -M ron ___ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Tarl Neustaedter
I'm trying to figure out why more of the conversations I find myself involved in are not on the public list. Is it a signal to noise ratio problem? More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add to their lists. The ~130 spa

Re: 64MB MMIO Hole ?

2004-02-11 Thread ron minnich
On 11 Feb 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > There is also PAT which will let you set attributes per > page and that is probably a cleaner solution when it is > available. yes. I never quite figured out why MTRRs existed, given that every other machine I used did this kind of thing with attributes

Re: LinuxBIOS....on desktop PCs?

2004-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:28:45AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > Do you know the LinuxBIOS status on it? Is it different from plain EPIA? > > it's the 6000 I think, a variant of the -M Yes, EPIA-CL6000E is what I'm looking at. (www.viavpsd.com -> Mainb

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:45:32PM -0500, Tarl Neustaedter wrote: > More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your > email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add > to their lists. The ~130 spams I receive every day have > sharpened my reflexes into almost never sending

Re:spam - was: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread tyson
Peter Stuge wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:45:32PM -0500, Tarl Neustaedter wrote: More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add to their lists. The ~130 spams I receive every day have sharpened my reflexes into almost n

Re: Re: LinuxBIOS....on desktop PCs?

2004-02-11 Thread Hendricks David W.
I suggest the Linksys WRT54G :) On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >turns out the chaintech just added doesn't build, which I forget. Anyone > >wants to take a look, please do. > > Ah...well, maybe later then? Or maybe when I get a nice embedded linux rackmount > server to replace

Re: 64MB MMIO Hole ?

2004-02-11 Thread Li-Ta Lo
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 20:27, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > > > Li-Ta Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Eric, > > > > > > You put a preprocessor warnning for 64MB MMIO Hole in > > > the amdk8/northbridge.c. > > > > > > #warning "FIXME improve

Re: 64MB MMIO Hole ?

2004-02-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Li-Ta Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But you also used it for AGP aperture in misc_control.c. Is there > any reason to do this ? Or the AGP aperture can actually be anything > else. As I recall the AGP aperature must be at least 64M if it exists. You can read the Opteron docs to confirm this.