Re: Why devices ARE or NOT on bus 0 ?

2004-04-23 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Li-Ta Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello guys, > > How does the enumeration decide if the devices in > 8111/8131 are on bus 0 or other bus ? In LinuxBIOS only the cpus are on bus 0, at least when we are done. > Isn't that > all these non-coherent devices are on PCIDEV(0,0,0), > at power up

Re: 答复: 答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote: > 3, 4, 5 already in the CVS tree. so 1,2, should go in now I think, and 6,7, clearly go in? ron ___ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: 答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote: > The only thing that didn't patch cleanly on my setup was a config file for > a Tyan board. Was there anything else that didn't apply cleanly to a CVS > tree, Ollie? It might be nice to get that ATi and btext stuff in there > quickly since there a

答复: 答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread YhLu
3, 4, 5 already in the CVS tree. YH -éäåä- åää: Hendricks David W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] åéæé: 2004å4æ23æ 14:52 æää: YhLu æé: Li-Ta Lo; ron minnich; Stefan Reinauer; LinuxBIOS äé: Re: ÂÃÂÂ: ATI rage xl.init The only thing that didn't patch cleanly on my setup was a config file for

Re: 答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread Hendricks David W.
The only thing that didn't patch cleanly on my setup was a config file for a Tyan board. Was there anything else that didn't apply cleanly to a CVS tree, Ollie? It might be nice to get that ATi and btext stuff in there quickly since there are likely others who are very, very interested in this

答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread YhLu
So I need to produce another patch except 3, 4 & 5? -邮件原件- 发件人: Li-Ta Lo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 发送时间: 2004年4月23日 11:00 收件人: YhLu 抄送: ron minnich; Stefan Reinauer; LinuxBIOS 主题: Re: ATI rage xl.init On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 11:56, YhLu wrote: > You only commit 4 & 5 ? > I haven't commit

Re: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread Li-Ta Lo
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 11:56, YhLu wrote: > You only commit 4 & 5 ? > I haven't commit anything yet. I am busy working on the ibm/e325 HT enumeration problem. I will look at the patch next week. Ollie > -éäåä- > åää: Li-Ta Lo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > åéæé: 2004å4æ21æ 14:47 > æää: YhL

Re: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread YhLu
You only commit 4 & 5 ? -邮件原件- 发件人: Li-Ta Lo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 发送时间: 2004年4月21日 14:47 收件人: YhLu 抄送: ron minnich; Stefan Reinauer; LinuxBIOS 主题: Re: ATI rage xl.init On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 19:38, YhLu wrote: > Ron, > > Please commit ati rage xl support. > > 1. ati rage xl support

Why devices ARE or NOT on bus 0 ?

2004-04-23 Thread Li-Ta Lo
Hello guys, How does the enumeration decide if the devices in 8111/8131 are on bus 0 or other bus ? Isn't that all these non-coherent devices are on PCIDEV(0,0,0), at power up ? How are they changed to their "real" PCIDEVFN ? We are having problems on ibm/e325 that these devices remain on bus 0 s

Openbios 1.0.RC1 build problems

2004-04-23 Thread Mathieu Deschamps
Well I've tryied to make dev/bios with the old makefile and it works perfectly and i know why. The version i got unstable200404xx handle 2.6kernel policy change on modules or something like that But I still don't understand these part of your code: ifeq ($(KERNEL)/.config,$(wildcard $(KERNEL)/.

Re: 答复: 答复: ATI rage xl.init

2004-04-23 Thread Brian Maly
This change got the mouse working on arima/hdama (and automagically got the keyboard working as well) for ATI RageXL framebuffer console and X. Was this what you wanted? Maybe I misunderstood... -Regards, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] hdama]$ pwd /home/brian/freebios2/src/mainboard/arima/hdama [EMAIL

Via epia m-II BiosSavior problems

2004-04-23 Thread Ignacio Verona
Hi! Just a few minutes ago I've built my first linuxbios romimage. This week, I bought a RD1-PL BiosSavior for my MB (PLCC socket) and installed it. For all this week, the BiosSavior has been working, with the switch on "ORG" position, and correctly loading factory bios. And, for writing my new BIO

Re: Open bios dev/bios bug report

2004-04-23 Thread ron minnich
On 23 Apr 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote: > oh I know this quite well. I think I didn't made myself clear enough. > Dev/bios opens or intents to open all the flash device of your > hardware (that's explains read/write/>? MANY bios) , but I wondering if > it could opens a DOC, since it's a ID

Re: Open bios dev/bios bug report

2004-04-23 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Mathieu Deschamps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040422 15:37]: > BIOS driver v0.3.2 (writing disabled) for 2.4.20-8 Have you tried the bk version from bk clone bk://openbios.bkbits.net/unstable ? Stefan ___ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Open bios dev/bios bug report

2004-04-23 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Mathieu Deschamps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040423 09:20]: > oh I know this quite well. I think I didn't made myself clear enough. > Dev/bios opens or intents to open all the flash device of your > hardware (that's explains read/write/>? MANY bios) , but I wondering if > it could opens a DOC, s

Re: Merge filo into Etherboot.

2004-04-23 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040423 07:47]: > I have merged the filo into the Etherboot 5.2.4 and make use Etherboot > Makefile etc to produce tg3--filo.zelf or filo.zelf > > Todo: to get rid of duplicate static function in filo. > > Can you put that changes in the Etherboot and as one official di

Re: Open bios dev/bios bug report

2004-04-23 Thread Mathieu Deschamps
Le jeu 22/04/2004 Ã 18:15, Peter Stuge a Ãcrit : > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:42:48PM +0200, Mathieu Deschamps wrote: > > > > > > > I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just > > > > write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to > > > > many bios. > > > >