I agree with what is said here, except if I may...
I need to react to your questions and This topic is NOT
a question of purity of code or of something nor only a policy...
Brief :
this is a stacke...
But let admitting that the question of extending the payload handling
seems central and IMHO
2.)
LinuxBIOS can currently execute one payload. For greater flexibility and
isolated development cycles of the firmware related code parts/projects
LinuxBIOS should allow payload chains, ie. executing multiple payloads
one after the other.
LinuxBIOS wants to keep up it's modularity,
Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There has been a similar proposal on this list a while ago, but nothing
happened so far, so I want to put this pack to discussion.
Objectives
--
1.)
LinuxBIOS is kind of hard to set up for project newbies, since it
does not only
On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 04:54 AM, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
Hello LinuxBiosers,
I have finish my reporting activities, i'am submiting
my work. It is has been done during my training period of
2 months or so. This was a short time and maybe I'am not
experimenced enough to give something to more
Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 06:27, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Kevin O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040610 06:09]:
If I understand your proposal correctly, one of the major issues will be
ensuring that the payloads don't step on each other or linuxbios when they
It certainly did look impressive... All sorts of charts and stuff :) It'll
be interesting to read it when it's translated.
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 04:54 AM, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
Hello LinuxBiosers,
I have finish my reporting
On 14 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
- Too many linuxbios options need to be specified in the top level
configuration file, or they don't work.
yes, that's on my list too.
- We don't have stable releases. You get snapshot of they day instead.
yes.
I'm not so sure I get this
Hendricks David W. wrote:
It certainly did look impressive... All sorts of charts and stuff :) It'll
be interesting to read it when it's translated.
Um wow!, I don't know if anyone else downloaded and started reading
that (I don't know who knows french on this list). In anycase,
Mathieu's
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, ron minnich wrote:
I'm not so sure I get this 'bloated' discussion. LinuxBIOS is around 32K.
What's bloat? linuxbios overall is about the size of 'cat'.
Closer to dog, actually :)
http://jl.photodex.com/dog/dog-1.7.tar.gz
___
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, ron minnich wrote:
I'm not so sure I get this 'bloated' discussion. LinuxBIOS is around 32K.
What's bloat? linuxbios overall is about the size of 'cat'.
Closer to dog, actually :)
Title: Message
Hi
all,
I'm trying to 'cvs
co freebios', but am getting 'waiting for xx's lock in
/cvsroot/freebios/freebios/src/northsouthbridge/sis'.
This was been
happening for 16+ hours now.
What is the story
with that?
...ta...john
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Check your CVS command string. SF updated to a newer release of BIND,
and it has a problem with the way the domains were arranged from the
earlier versions. So it becomes like this:
#cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/freebios
login and then:
#cvs -z3
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Check your CVS command string. SF updated to a newer release of BIND,
and it has a problem with the way the domains were arranged from the
earlier versions. So it becomes like this:
#cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/freebios
login and then:
Yeah. I
13 matches
Mail list logo
