Re: FYI: Merge in progress...

2004-10-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
The ARIMA HDAMA now boots, and everything looks like it is working properly. Converting everything else still remains but we now have a working example to look at. We are down to one device tree instead of two. And hardwaremain has been reduced to: void hardwaremain(int boot_complete) {

RE: FYI: Merge in progress...

2004-10-16 Thread Yinghai Lu
So chip tree is merged into device tree. I'm eager to convert my MB to use that. Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8? Regards YH -Original Message- From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric W. Biederman Sent: Saturday, October 16,

Re: FYI: Merge in progress...

2004-10-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So chip tree is merged into device tree. Yep. I'm eager to convert my MB to use that. Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8? Not in theory. In practice I think this is the one case that has not yet been fixed in config.g for

RE: FYI: Merge in progress...

2004-10-16 Thread Yinghai Lu
Great, I will test that Monday. The code can be complied for s2885 and s2895. Regards Yinghai Lu -Original Message- From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric W. Biederman Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 1:06 PM To: Yinghai Lu Cc: 'Ronald G. Minnich';

Re: FYI: Merge in progress...

2004-10-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So chip tree is merged into device tree. Yep. I'm eager to convert my MB to use that. Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8? Not anymore. I just worked through that case