* Eric W. Biederman ebiederman@lnxi.com [050106 04:10]:
It seems it's also impossible to check out the old files with
cvs co -D 2003-07-30 20:00 freebios2
Very weird. I would run cvs log to see if you can spot the proper revisions
and see if you can check out the individual files. I
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Adam Talbot wrote:
I have been told that pulling the vgabios is easy with DD. Never tried this
my self. Currently I have been decompressing the rom image and adding the
vga bios in by hand. Do you think it would be possible to add a script into
the buildtarget script,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Joshua Wise wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, so I just got my grubby paws on an HP tablet - a tc1100, to be exact.
Here are the relevant bits from lspci:
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82855PM Processor to AGP Controller (rev
03)
this one is tough, as Intel is not
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Richard Smith wrote:
I guess this means that this is a V2 only thing. Looks like a 440bx
port to V2 will be in my near future.
Richard, I think moving forward is your best bet. Since the last round of
changes V2 has settled down and it is pretty nice.
ron
On Jan 5, 2005, at 9:40 PM, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
No. The do_vgabios is depreciated and is removed from the CVS. It
uses a
real mode switch which is very difficult to to debug and not portable.
The prefered way now is to use the emulator to execut the
bitkeeper anyone? I'm using it for a lot of projects and going back to
sourceforge all the time is getting annoying.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 23:22, Richard Smith wrote:
--- Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the emulator to execut the VBIOS. The emulator is
acting
as the .init method of a generic vga device driver.
I guess this means that this is a V2 only thing.
Looks like a 440bx port to V2 will
--- Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@lanl.gov wrote:
I guess this means that this is a V2 only thing.
Looks like a 440bx
port to V2 will be in my near future.
Richard, I think moving forward is your best bet.
Since the last round of
changes V2 has settled down and it is pretty nice.
In due time V2+filo or V2+kernelkexec is where I'll
be headed but I'm just not in a position currently to
rewrite my entire setup.
ok, then I'd go with Ollie's suggestion of a backport. Actually, it's
interesting to note, for a lot of ports V1 is still a pretty handy system
to use, since
Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
bitkeeper anyone? I'm using it for a lot of projects and going back to
sourceforge all the time is getting annoying.
If we made regular releases bitkeeper might be an option.
As it is I have extreme problems with their free license.
Stefan how has
* Eric W. Biederman ebiederman@lnxi.com [050106 21:01]:
Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
bitkeeper anyone? I'm using it for a lot of projects and going back to
sourceforge all the time is getting annoying.
If we made regular releases bitkeeper might be an option.
As it is I
Hello,
It turns out that the VGABIOS support can be made pretty generic
for all kinds of PCI expansion ROM. So I have the emulator the
.init method of default_pci_ops_dev. I am going to add the following
directories, if there is no objection, I will commit it next week.
src/include/x86emu --
Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
It turns out that the VGABIOS support can be made pretty generic
for all kinds of PCI expansion ROM. So I have the emulator the
.init method of default_pci_ops_dev. I am going to add the following
directories, if there is no objection, I will
Also it should be controlled by some CONFIG_X86EMUin case it is not
needed by some configuration. And if CONFIG_CONSOLE_VGA is enabled, it
should be automatically enabled
YH
-Original Message-
From: ebiederman@lnxi.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:31
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
Any comments ?
This is wonderful, as it may solve the SCSI problem too.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
Any comments ?
This is wonderful, as it may solve the SCSI problem too.
I agree with eric that in general going to expansion roms as an option is
undesirable, but ... sometimes you have no choice. I
Ronald G. Minnich writes:
bitkeeper anyone? I'm using it for a lot of projects and going back to
sourceforge all the time is getting annoying.
If we made regular releases bitkeeper might be an option.
As it is I have extreme problems with their free license.
I would suggest using Subversion.
The fallback image tries to load the normal image but if that
fails it'll take over and continue with the fallback image.
So I am guessing the 2 images are the same. Then why 2 exact the same
image? In case of damaged flash area?
I am asking this because I want to embed a linux kernel in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
