Would it be easier to design this into gcc as a separate architecture or
would that be too unmanagable? It may or may not be of benefit to other
embedded projects as well so there may be more help keeping it up to date if
it was in the gcc tree. Then again, someone could modify it for their ow
I had similar trouble with 2.4.19 on a Tyan E7500 motherboard and RH80. The
stock RH 2.4.18 wouldn't work either and none of the pre 2.4.20's I tried
would work. I could only get 2.4.18 to run stable. I used the gcc that came
with RH80 kernel builds I think, though I've since downgraded to th
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 17:44, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote:
> > > Aren't the bios chips soldered down on some of these boards? I
> >
> > was wondering
> >
> > > what alternatives you have, short of unsoldering the chip and finding a
> > > programmer, if something goes wrong in the flashing process
On Friday 25 October 2002 05:20, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Friday 25 October 2002 8:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello World,
> >
> > I try to set up a LinuxBIOS System. What i really can not understand is
> > the following: When I Flash the root filesystem into the BIOS Flash rom,
> > where
I think the problem might be the name of the project. Many BSD users,
especially freeBSD, wouldn't get caught dead running anything linux if they
can help it. Silly elitist attitude, much like the elitist attitude some
linux users take towards windows users. Now if it was still named freeBIO
On Sunday 22 September 2002 21:26, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2002, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Be very, very careful with this. Writing the rom is easy.
> > Finding and setting all of the stupid CMOS type parameters
> > in the romimage is a much more difficult proposition.
>
> this is
gned, then after the fact issued an update to the P64H2 specification).
>
> We were able to get a new BIOS from supermicro that fixes this.
> Linux Networx (Eric) is also doing LinuxBIOS for these boards and has the
> workaround implemented as well.
>
> Jim
>
> On Wed, 18 Se
I was working on trying to get this box to turn on DMA for the drives and we
get an error: We used the stock 2.4.18-3smp kernel from redhat 7.3 and also
2.4.19 from source. The motherboard is a dual P4 tyan, I didn't catch the
model number.
We double checked the DMA settings and enabled an u
I've always thought it would be a good idea to rig up some sort of flash that
emulates a floppy for the floppy interface. I dont know if it would be
practical or not but it would be an unused device, at least one unit should
be free in most computers. Also the drivers for the floppy aren't li
I found 2 devices like you pointed out, I was thinking more of the third way
you described. They offer a riser card with 2 slots as an option. What they
might have done is what some of the passive backplane systems do which is
include extra IDSEL signals in unused PCI pins. How would a card
Is this the new mini micro ATX board with the C3 CPU and the VIA chipset?
What kind of support does that have for an LCD screen? I was looking at the
VIA site and I couldn't find out if the chipset had any digital video output.
One other general question, is it possible to piggyback several
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
12 matches
Mail list logo
