On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040603 17:23]:
the current pirq code defines intel_irq_routing_table as const, thus
making it potentially readonly.
should be const due to execute-in-place issues.
What's the benefit in this case? we have
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
Yes. I think it would. Got any ideas on the implementation? I'm ready
to try an implement this.
in the main loop for instruction decode there is a single instruction
dispatch function. Create a global counter (emulate_counter?) and
increment it
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
This will only skip the jump (and do the BX decrement) if ax is zero.
For ax to be zero the result of the 2's complement subtraction must be
zero or the when the 2 reads are the same number. But I just don't see
how this would happen repeatably at
On 1 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
That Intel will be releasing code is new, although there have been some
sympathies in that direction. I'm really not interested until they actually
release something.
Should probably also mention: there's lots of binary in this EFI/Tiano
thing. Binary
On 1 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The alpha port worked but it is not something I savor repeating,
there were too many real limitations.
yes, but by golly we sure got some use out of it! We appreciated your work
:-)
There are some things that I find strongly architecturally
I think that these experiences only strengthen my feeling that we want
linux in there as the bios. We're going to recreate all that work. Anybody
ready to squeeze 2.6 in there? We all want it but nobody has had time yet.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing
On 1 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Unless you spend days at it you cannot do a good memory check/test. I
don't want to wait days while my system boots. A cursory check That
verifies the memory doesn't totally suck is ok. But I don't want to see
anything that conveys the impression that
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Jay Miller wrote:
Can someone post a quick rundown on testbios?
I know that you get the vgabios from the card, and run that through
testbios. But how do you get linuxbios to use the results?
linuxbios does not use testbios yet. You run testbios under linux. Sorry,
this
what's the chipset? send lspci.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
One thing that is generally good about ACPI (well in some sense) is that
it is free of callbacks, which I often hear as a disadvantage of Open
Firmware's interface. (While dropping callbacks in OF is just a matter
of directly providing the FCode
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, YhLu wrote:
So need to use memtest to test memory?
don't test it at all. Just use it, the kernel will find the problems more
effectively than memtest will.
Besides many problems only occur after the system has been on for a while.
ron
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, backblue wrote:
One of my boards are like that one, chipset it's nforce2.
no luck.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Joshua Wise wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I read the FAQ looking for information on chipsets supported in LinuxBIOS, and
it pointed me towards the status page, however I can only find information
about mainboards on that page. Am I looking in
On 1 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
There are a couple of short term hacks that I can do with relocating
memory but on the Opteron the more memory I add the more problems
I run into. And moving BARS above 4G looks like the right term
fix.
Any objections?
How are we going to cover the
just FYI, making BARS live above the 32-bit limit will break every single
linux cluster here at LANL, and will also disable Plan 9.
With BARS under the 32-bit limit, you can boot anything. With BARS above
that limit, you immediately limit what you can boot.
I think what really ought to happen
word from someone who knows that acpi tables have many errors. Windows
drivers work around the bugs in acpi tables. Linux follows the spec
closely, hence the problems people see with linux+acpi.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lindows/linspire never got back to me re a laptop port.
no interest at their end.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
or you can translate the acpi tables to Something Else (e.g. e-expressions
-- it works) and use that instead.
acpi is a big problem, partly due to the binary nature and partly because
it is so broken on so many platforms.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Ben Johnson wrote:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x] (rev c4)
I don't believe we support this one.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1 Jun 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just FYI, making BARS live above the 32-bit limit will break every single
linux cluster here at LANL, and will also disable Plan 9.
Only for the hardware where the BARs move.
guess I missed something
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Steve Gehlbach wrote:
Speaking of ACPI and problems, which are commented on in this article,
is this Intel announcement of open sourcing the BIOS something new?
http://news.com.com/Intel+to+open+code+for+booting+up+PCs%2C+servers/2100-7337_3-5223860.html?tag=nefd.top
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Bari Ari wrote:
Here's the official Intel statement:
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20040601corp_a.htm
gee, no mention of linuxbios :-)
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
indeed true. But for x86 hardware, putting all of the x86 emulator in
rom is less elegant than vm86 stuff, even though I have no clue about
the later.
yes but recall that the emulator lets you support systems like power pc.
ron
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
I don't suppose there is a way to use testbios with a system having 2
video cards is there?
the spec says that you can call a card bios with a devfn and it should all
work. Not all cards work however as their bios is brain-dead.
ron
now we need usb output. The HP node we got has no serial port!
ouch!
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
It seems that the resource allocation for option rom
is not implemented in LinuxBIOS, is it ? Is there one
have any idea how to add this ?
When I borrowed that code originally from linux I believe it always
disabled option roms. You should be able to
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040527 22:49]:
Also, the graphics card option roms are usually hardcoded to 0xc
Do you mean the expansion rom BAR is hard coded to 0xc ?
The how does the bios copy the bios in ROM at 0xc to memory
On Thu, 27 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
Usb to serial ???
yes, it's now needed :-(
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 27 May 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Be very careful here. The PCI spec allows the option rom BAR
to be mutually exclusive with the other BARS so in general
they both can not be enabled.
should not matter if you are running an emulator.
ron
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
This procedure should be a part of testbios rather than LinuxBIOS' PCI
code, but reserving some space for it early might be the way to go
indeed.
just remember you're in an emulator. If you can get option rom contents
copied out then the emulator
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
Do you mean the expansion rom BAR is hard coded to 0xc ?
it's not. It can be anywhere. For dumping vgabios I would actually set it
by setpci to an unused place, mmap /dev/mem, and dump it out. It can go
anywhere.
ron
I will try this tool and if it looks good perhaps we can put it into
freebios2/util/lbcc
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Mon, 24 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
Does the emulator works with ATI vgabios?
not yet, this is due to the long-standing INT 10 problem
That fix is on our to-do list.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 May 2004, M. Renee Hopkins wrote:
Does anyone have ideas about modifications to support higher DDR RAM than
128MB?
V2.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 18 May 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
I'am looking for a while to set a new options in Config.lb to test
my V2 VGABIOS code : i need VGABIOS_START options and ZKERNEL
START also, theses are deprecated in V2. Is the config python script
openned to user's new entries ?
you don't need these
Don't let your stupid virus scanner do this :-)
if you can imagine ... the word free in the subject is lo longer allowed
at some sites.
ron
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:18:47 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Content violation
even better. I get this bounce all the time.
And no, the whitelist registration did not work at all :-)
ron
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:00:23 +02120 (MEST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Content violation (fwd)
Absender/Sender:
On 17 May 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
INSTALL REAL-MODE IDT
DO THE VGA BIOS
found VGA: vid=1106, did=3122
write_protect_vgabios
0x55 0xaa 0x70 0xe9 0xfc 0x7f 0x8b 0x1b 0x34 0xde 0xca 0x83 0x0 0x0 0x0
0x0 bus/
that means it is ok.
___
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
There's a potential hint in src/arch/i386/lib/idt.c:biosint():
// cases in a good compiler are just as good as your own tables.
switch (intnumber) {
case 0 ... 15:
[..]
#ifdef CONFIG_PCIBIOS
case
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Ignacio Verona wrote:
1. I can't get VGA to work. I've extracted it from a original-bios booted
system with
dd if=/proc/kcore of=video.bios.bin bs=1 count=65536 skip=790528
and then appended it to my filo payload like the HOWTO says I've to do,
and modified the
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Ignacio Verona wrote:
biosint: # 0xb8, eax 0x707 ebx 0x0 ecx 0x700 edx 0x0
biosint: ebp 0x10fca esp 0xfc0 edi 0xb880 esi 0x1010a
biosint: ip 0x188 cs 0xc000 flags 0x246
biosint: Unsupport int #0xb8
b8? Anybody know what that one is?
ron
On Fri, 14 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has any work been done toward the goal of Hibernation?
It would sure be nice if you would do it ... you would be very popular!
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 14 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, would something like this be contained in a payload?
you could save the entire state of the physical memeory as an elf ...
but what about swap? Should be ok ...
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL
On Fri, 14 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question. To do this effectively we'll need a hook into
running a BIOS process from inside the OS (trigger to save state and
shutdown.) How difficult is this to do?
don't assume anything.
To do this effectively you need a hook into
On 13 May 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
hum i see ... but didn't we got native LinuxBIOS VGA up on EPIA-M ?
on V1 not V2. It works fine on V1. But ram detection on V1 is not working.
You only get one size ram.
I should drawback to do it vga bios way ... need to push 1x LB base
start
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote:
Oops, I forgot to mention Stefan's patch for FILO to make IDE work on the
S2885. I think this is the one:
http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2003-October/005753.html
can we get this put back into filo?
ron
I just committed the fix Richard Smith needed.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
I'm not going to get too look at -M for another 10 days.
But we'd like to get that up under V2 with graphics. Also I have no docs
from VIA yet.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Jay Miller wrote:
Also, once I get fully up to speed let me know if I can help in anyway.
I believe in giving back, so if I can write a newbie HOWTO or something,
let me know.
we always love these ... :-)
ron
___
Linuxbios
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote:
PS. Don't forget that you can commit on Sourceforge now :)
yeah but we should have a few more eyes on it BEFORE commit.
thanks
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Jay Miller wrote:
My S2885 board is only uni-processor, so I modified the follow options:
option CONFIG_MAX_CPUS=1
option CONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS=0
option CONFIG_MAX_PHYSICAL_CPUS=1
But the static.c that is generated still enumerates two CPUs. What else
do I need to do
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Jay Miller wrote:
What format is this image?
it's a raw set of bytes. It's an image.
Has anyone used this type of burner to flash their BIOS chips?
yes, it works fine. I used to do it all the time.
ron
___
Linuxbios
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Craig C Forney wrote:
Is the current source tree in an unstable state? Or is my build
environment screwed up?
I guess somebody busted something, let me try it ...
well, can't get to it just now. Hold on and let me get back to you.
ron
you're still not setting up your elfimage correctly somehow, but I can't
tell how.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
no real kernel patches needed any more. We use FILO and it brings up the
IDE just fine, etherboot works well too.
Go to freebios.sourceforge.net to find the source tree.
To check it out:
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/freebios login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL
Ollie, you busted the tree, I think.
can you fix?
/rminnich/src/bios/freebios2/src/mainboard/arima/hdama'
-DMAINBOARD_PART_NUMBER='HDAMA' -DMAINBOARD_VENDOR='ARIMA'
-DCONFIG_SMP='1' -DCONFIG_MAX_CPUS='2' -DCONFIG_MAX_PHYSICAL_CPUS='2'
-DCONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS='0' -DCONFIG_IDE_STREAM='0'
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jay Miller wrote:
/home/jmiller/freebios2/src/southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_lpc.c: In
function `lpc_init':
/home/jmiller/freebios2/src/southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_lpc.c:153:
warning: implicit declaration of function `isa_dma_init'
your spam filter needs fixin'. it will reject any email on subject such as
freebios, freebsd, etc.
see below. It figures it's a symantec filter.
ron
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:27:49 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Content
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jacob Alifrangis (LISTS) wrote:
Is there any support in the tree for a Technologic Systems TS-5x00 board.
This looks like an SC 520 board?. Is it? If so I'm VERY interested, but
only if flash is removable. Can you find out?
Which one of these are you using. If it does
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jacob Alifrangis (LISTS) wrote:
I would like to help cleanup the 'supported systems' list on the website and
update it.
that's actually not the problem. The problem is automating unit testing.
The supported systems is driven by a script already. People don't always
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Bari Ari wrote:
They all look like AMD Elan based boards. I don't think anyone ever
tried to get them up, but all the specs to do so are at:
http://www.amd.com/epd/processors/4.32bitcont/14.lan5xxfam/24.lansc520/
I have an sc520 board, but the flash part is
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jacob Alifrangis (LISTS) wrote:
The uboot project has amd elan support already.
yep. We can use some of that code too.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
I will try to fix v1 config tool today.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Flavio Tobias wrote:
How can I boot and run Linux from a PenDrive or CompactFlash or other kind of flash
memory device?
sure.
How can I do that?
you'll have to hope somebody here can show you.
There is some documentation about this?
our docs are terrible.
There
the way I would want to do diskless windows is under vmware, I would never
trust it otherwise.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
How do I specify 2 superios in V1 that are the same chip only different
pnp bases using nsuperio?
here's how it should work (example, two same part at 0x370 and 0x3f0):
nsuperio SMC/fdc37b72x com1={1} port=0x370
nsuperio SMC/fdc37b72x com1={1}
bug. I screwed up.
I'll try to see how to fix this. It will take me a bit but I think it is
easy, I did handle this in V2.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, 4 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
I'm going to add several lines in amd8111_enable of amd8111.c to disable
USB2 in amd8111.
/* disable usb2 in amd 8111 because it does not work awlays*/
byte = pci_read_config8(lpc_dev, 0x47);
byte |= (17);
On Wed, 5 May 2004, ron minnich wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
I'm going to add several lines in amd8111_enable of amd8111.c to disable
USB2 in amd8111.
/* disable usb2 in amd 8111 because it does not work awlays*/
byte = pci_read_config8(lpc_dev, 0x47
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 23:26, YhLu wrote:
Ron,
I'm going to add several lines in amd8111_enable of amd8111.c to disable
USB2 in amd8111.
/* disable usb2 in amd 8111 because it does not work awlays*/
byte =
On Wed, 5 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
According to AMD, USB 2 in amd8111 will never work.
well, that's certainly interesting.
If AMD is certain about that, and no one else objects, I remove any
concerns I have about this code. But please put in a more informative
comment such as will never work
On Wed, 5 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
I change my mind, disable that in Config.lb is better and less code.
good!
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Wed, 5 May 2004, YhLu wrote:
If I changed config.lb
PCI 1:0.2 on -- PCI 1:0.2 off
The PCI 1:0.0 and PCI 1:0.1 will be disabled together.
According to AMD 8111 data sheet, LPC 0x48, only can be disabled the device
in second bus by device num, and the three USB share one device number.
we are working on putting the emulator into linuxbios as an optional
component. Once this is done, I think the prognosis is good. We've gotten
distracted by fixing other things needed to support the emulator.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Bari Ari wrote:
What will be needed to run video on non-x86? The oem videoBIOS plus an
8086 emulator for when videoBIOS calls are made?
we don't plan to support videoBIOS calls, just plan to support enabling
the hardware.
ron
video application
-
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
we are working on putting the emulator into linuxbios as an optional
component. Once this is done, I think the prognosis is good. We've gotten
distracted by fixing other things needed to support the emulator.
My tests
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Bari Ari wrote:
I know this is going beyond Ron's plan. Let's say there is source for an
XFree86 driver for a graphics device with all the 3-D and Zoom port
support. I haven't looked at the emulator yet. Using the 8086 emulator
would this support fb driver only? or would
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
Last time I check, the ATI vgabios wanted to install int 0x10 handler
and call into itself via int 0x10. The emulator can't do this yet.
Right, I had forgotten this problem.
Silly VGA BIOS.
ron
___
Linuxbios
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
You copied some smbus and hw monitor code from hdama
to e325. Are they correct on this board ? Is the
hardware the same across those k8 boards ? Should we
move it to some shared directory ?
I have no clue.
Sorry.
I just don't know what's on that damned
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
I wonder if we can enable framebuffer for add on display card so we can get
output from crt via btext console.
it's going to happen. First we have to resolve issues with the k8 and
linuxbios.
ron
___
Linuxbios
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Langlois Evan wrote:
What are the chances of this working on the Tyan S2875S ? Possible with
an ATI Radeon card instead of GeForce (assuming the same tricks work on
both).
It should work fine since the approach we take is 8086 emulation to
support the bios.
And does
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote:
We haven't had any success with Radeon cards in LinuxBIOS in our lab,
though Ollie Lho might have some more information on that for you.
oops. I didn't realize we had trouble with them.
oh well.
ron
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Dmitry Borisov wrote:
ATM it takes about 9 secs to go to payload.
yikes!
I think it is time to revive Ollie's serial post + tsc, which for some
reason went away.
That's nuts.
7 secs to go to splash. Which seems to be really high values.
Does anyone can say what it
On 27 Apr 2004, Peter Lister wrote:
My suggestion is to consider managing FILO as part of the Etherboot tree
- Etherboot already has an IDE disk driver, which predates FILO, IIRC.
The two projects are obvious complements. Also, I'd bet that an
integrated set of net / disk / flash device
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
To me filo is just like enhancement to Etherboot ide_disk.zelf. but it is
more smart that it can understand file system and boot linux/initrd instead
of elf.
good point. Seems like pinging the etherboot guys is a good idea!
ron
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Devices with bus master set are allowed to DMA into main memory
whenever they feel like it so it is dangerous to enable that
bit indiscriminately.
-- If at all, it should be done with careful checking.
Here is a possible scenario. You are in
I think with Stefan's last set of patches we're missing some cvs adds?
Stefan?
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
is this with linuxbios?
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
If you need to use it, I send you pre-built image, because I can not publish
the source code of lsi_scsi. LSI don¡¯t want to.
grr.
Is there a ROM BIOS for it?
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just commented out the #dir ../
entry in mainboard/tyan/s2880/Config.lb and the buildtarget seems ok. I
will commit.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
When enabling lsi_scsi support, It need leave 48k in the BIOS ROM for
lsi_scsi fw. So need to change normal mode ROM_SIZE to 512k-48k.
OK, BTW you can do this:
option ROM_SIZE = 512*1024 - 48*1024
which is not as readable as 512k-48k, but is pretty
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
Don't forget 2. otherwise the final image will short some.
What should it be?
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
When I using the new config to deal with it, the tool seems doesn¡¯t support
expression. I will check that in current config tool.
it supports the expression, it just gets it wrong. Sorry. Another bug!
ron
___
On 26 Apr 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
It does not sound like it as we already handle these issues.
just wanted to make sure :-)
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Peter Stuge wrote:
My humble suggestion would be to try to find a suitable EPIA board and
use LinuxBIOS with FILO as the payload, and use a CF+IDE-adapter for
kernel and system storage. I haven't done any work to support the
suggestion, but still it seems and feels like
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
Do you need to create contrib or payload dir to put such kind of patch.
I think this has come up. I hate like heck to think about putting a fork
of Etherboot in the linuxbios tree. It just seems like a bad idea.
I think we need to figure out what about it
stefan, thanks very much.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Yinghai Lu wrote:
8.
Sometimes, if you not enable PCI master, the device can not work properly in
Linux.
But Eric/Ron didn't enable that in PCI main loop, because some devices don't
need that.
because it is a bad idea to do this. The Linux driver should do this,
On 23 Apr 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
oh I know this quite well. I think I didn't made myself clear enough.
Dev/bios opens or intents to open all the flash device of your
hardware (that's explains read/write/? MANY bios) , but I wondering if
it could opens a DOC, since it's a IDE
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Hendricks David W. wrote:
The only thing that didn't patch cleanly on my setup was a config file for
a Tyan board. Was there anything else that didn't apply cleanly to a CVS
tree, Ollie? It might be nice to get that ATi and btext stuff in there
quickly since there are
101 - 200 of 1000 matches
Mail list logo
