On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
> To me filo is just like enhancement to Etherboot ide_disk.zelf. but it is
> more smart that it can understand file system and boot linux/initrd instead
> of elf.
good point. Seems like pinging the etherboot guys is a good idea!
ron
produce
filo.zelf, and it is less 32k now.
I didn't enable the multiboot in filo of Etherboot yet.
YH
-邮件原件-
发件人: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2004年4月27日 12:00
收件人: Peter Lister
抄送: YhLu; Stefan Reinauer; Eric W Biederman; LinuxBIOS
主题: Re: 答复: Etherboot 5.2.4 +
On 27 Apr 2004, Peter Lister wrote:
> My suggestion is to consider managing FILO as part of the Etherboot tree
> - Etherboot already has an IDE disk driver, which predates FILO, IIRC.
> The two projects are obvious complements. Also, I'd bet that an
> integrated set of net / disk / flash device se
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 03:26, ron minnich wrote:
> I think this has come up. I hate like heck to think about putting a fork
> of Etherboot in the linuxbios tree. It just seems like a bad idea.
Very bad idea - especially as Etherboot is undergoing significant
development just now, with the PXE su
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, YhLu wrote:
> Do you need to create contrib or payload dir to put such kind of patch.
I think this has come up. I hate like heck to think about putting a fork
of Etherboot in the linuxbios tree. It just seems like a bad idea.
I think we need to figure out what about it Eth
+ btext console + filo patch
Stefan or Eric,
Please help to test the patch.
After add sth in filo_x.c, we can support simple menu
Regards
YH
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
6 matches
Mail list logo
