On 23 Apr 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
> oh I know this quite well. I think I didn't made myself clear enough.
> Dev/bios opens or intents to open all the flash device of your
> hardware (that's explains read/write/>? MANY bios) , but I wondering if
> it could opens a DOC, since it's a ID
* Mathieu Deschamps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040422 15:37]:
> BIOS driver v0.3.2 (writing disabled) for 2.4.20-8
Have you tried the bk version from
bk clone bk://openbios.bkbits.net/unstable ?
Stefan
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
* Mathieu Deschamps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040423 09:20]:
> oh I know this quite well. I think I didn't made myself clear enough.
> Dev/bios opens or intents to open all the flash device of your
> hardware (that's explains read/write/>? MANY bios) , but I wondering if
> it could opens a DOC, s
Le jeu 22/04/2004 Ã 18:15, Peter Stuge a Ãcrit :
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:42:48PM +0200, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
> > >
> > > > I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just
> > > > write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to
> > > > many bios.
> > >
>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:42:48PM +0200, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
> >
> > > I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just
> > > write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to
> > > many bios.
> >
> > If you're going to do that why not just use MTD?
> > If it
Le jeu 22/04/2004 Ã 15:51, ron minnich a Ãcrit :
> On 22 Apr 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
>
> > I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just
> > write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to
> > many bios.
>
> If you're going to do that why not just use MT
On 22 Apr 2004, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
> I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just
> write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to
> many bios.
If you're going to do that why not just use MTD?
If it works it is pretty ideal.
ron
_
Hello,
I want to make /dev/bios work because LinuxBIOS flash utils just
write whereas /dev/bios is IMO a elegant way to read/write/>? to
many bios.
My mainboard bios is a SST29EE020 (which is supported to write)
I do a setpci -s 0:11.0 40b.54 that's ok considering my lspci' output:
Device: 00:0
8 matches
Mail list logo