Re:spam - was: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread tyson
Peter Stuge wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:45:32PM -0500, Tarl Neustaedter wrote: More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add to their lists. The ~130 spams I receive every day have sharpened my reflexes into almost n

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:45:32PM -0500, Tarl Neustaedter wrote: > More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your > email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add > to their lists. The ~130 spams I receive every day have > sharpened my reflexes into almost never sending

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Tarl Neustaedter
I'm trying to figure out why more of the conversations I find myself involved in are not on the public list. Is it a signal to noise ratio problem? More likely reflex; posting to the general list leaves your email address exposed on the web for spammers to find and add to their lists. The ~130 spa

Re: stdarg.h and -nostdinc

2004-02-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040211 16:22]: > > I can't think of anything better. My wish list is to try to remove > > GNU-isms so I can build this on Plan 9, but at the same time we keep > > hitting these issues. > > > > If we are determined