OK, great, I'm going to try that after work.
Thanx
Damien
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:35:41 -0600 (MDT)
ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Damien Charlet wrote:
I'm using flash_rom, and I don't have a spare part to try.
OK, LNXI has found issues with w49f parts and it
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Damien Charlet wrote:
I'm using flash_rom, and I don't have a spare part to try.
OK, LNXI has found issues with w49f parts and it seems MTD drivers do
better than flash_rom. I think you should try to see if MTD will do a
better job.
ron
Ok guys, back on my ol' mail after some other work :)
Thanx for all your replies so here's where I am now :
1 - The original chip is a sst39 part whereas my savior has a w49
2 - This is the part referenced by IOSS for epia
3 - This chip almost work with my via :
I can flash it, read it, boot on
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Damien Charlet wrote:
The wrong bytes always change after reflash.
always the same bytes? even with a different part? Flashing with MTD or
flash_rom?
Where could I dig more in depth ?
need more info ...
ron
___
Linuxbios
First, Thank you for your answers.
Unfortunately I tried again and again today and I can't properly flash my winbond chip.
I even tried to nice -19 flash_rom, remove the print's but it doesn't help.
I dumped several time the content burned, and there are each time several errors, not
twice the
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Damien Charlet wrote:
My original BIOS is a 39SF020 A.
According to http://www.ioss.com.tw/web/English/RD1BIOSSavior/SelectionSheet.html I
got the good savior for epia (better double check !).
You don't think so ?
I don't think that 39F and 49F are compatible.
ron
6 matches
Mail list logo
