Re: [LinuxBIOS] Chipset support

2006-10-29 Thread Jaganmohan, Gopinath \(Cognizant\)
Title: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Chipset support Hi, Thank you for reply. My super IO is Winbond chip W836275hfa And the bios is socket chip is SST 494003A 334cnh. Please let me know how i can contribute so that Make is Intel 845GE North bridge to work. regards Gopinath From: Uwe Hermann

[LinuxBIOS] Support for Intel G965 GMCH Chipset?

2006-10-29 Thread Chris Ziomkowski
I am investigating options for an embedded systems project which we need to launch Q1 next year. I found linuxbios and love the idea. I have a few concerns though, and I thought someone here might be able to help me decide how difficult it might be to go this route. First, all of the

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2477 build service

2006-10-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061028 22:33]: Hi, On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:28:46PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: one thing, which would also allow a really quick checking on your own machine (or therefore centrally on linuxbios.org as well) is to drop romcc. This will get build

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Please let me know the status for this chipset

2006-10-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061028 22:09]: Hi, On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:53:47AM +0100, Raffaele de Leon wrote: Looks like great work here. I downloaded and built LinuxBIOS V2 solely to use flashrom, however when I executed the binary it went through all the probing and decided

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Cache as ram on VIA C3/C7 cpu

2006-10-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Hi, side note: could you try sending emails in ascii or utf8? It is hard for many on this list to read this mail otherwise.. I am trying to implement CAR on VIA C3 / C7 cpu. good! After DRAM initialization, resetting the CACHE and switching the stack to DRAM, the system will hang. How can

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Support for Intel G965 GMCH Chipset?

2006-10-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061029 15:44]: Do you think linuxbios is stable enough to consider for a commercial product? I think LinuxBIOS is more stable than any commercial BIOS, and that's just one of it's advantages. :) I would even say 99.99% of all LinuxBIOS systems are in use

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Tyan s2892 the OLPC way

2006-10-29 Thread yhlu
can we make one more generic buildrom and put into tree? git or svn should be ok. it should only produce payload only. How abut call it buildpayload? We can use Myles Watson's modification as a base. YH -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Tyan s2892 the OLPC way

2006-10-29 Thread ron minnich
there is a buildrom tree at openbios.org use the co command for linuxbios but specify buildrom. actually, the OLPC buildrom is generic enough at this point that we should be abe to use it with few mods. I extended it a bit and all we need is a set of pre-built .config files, one per mainboard,

Re: [LinuxBIOS] 答复: 答复: MSI ms9185 li nuxbios support

2006-10-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:36:41PM +0800, bxshi wrote: 1. Should the header added to all files ? for example cache_as_ram_auto.c ,get_bus_conf.c ? but I cann't find any project has the header in these files . Yes, please add it to all files. We're currently in the process of adding the

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Chipset support

2006-10-29 Thread Peter Stuge
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:29:45PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: And the bios is socket chip is SST 494003A 334cnh. Can't find information on that either. I guess this is a 49(L?)F008A, the 33-4C-NH marks speed, operating temperature range and package. //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] License headers for broadcom/blast files.

2006-10-29 Thread yhlu
let me talk to serverworks and AMD legal. YH On 10/29/06, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add missing license headers to the Broadcom Blast files (refs #5). Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch adds the GPL headers to the Broadcom Blast files. I have