Quoting Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
super_io-pad61 - spi_chip-pad1 (nCS)
Is this a 0 ohm connection?
I think so.. (at least my multimeter in bip-bip mode shouts loud when I connect
the 2 pads ;-) = that means 5ohms in general..)
I have a little question : does someone have a more
Hello again,
i finally got my linuxbios running under my db800 development board.
I now have a problem with ethernet. When there is traffic over the
ethernet device there come a lot of r8169: eth0: link up messages
again and again. Also the datarate is very very slow (~100kbyte).
I tryed it
By the way:
dmesg:
PCI: Guessed IRQ 11 for device :00:0d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with :00:0f.3
eth0: RTL8169sb/8110sb at 0xd000, 00:08:ee:00:ee:1c, IRQ 11
lspci -v
...
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169
Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
On Monday 03 September 2007 15:34, Steffen D. wrote:
By the way:
dmesg:
PCI: Guessed IRQ 11 for device :00:0d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with :00:0f.3
eth0: RTL8169sb/8110sb at 0xd000, 00:08:ee:00:ee:1c, IRQ 11
lspci -v
...
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek
I compared the outputs from dmesg and lspci (-vvv) with linuxbios and
normal bios - no difference!
Also the option irqpoll doesn't changed anyhing (i added it to the grub
line of the linux which boots the final system..)
Steffen
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
This commit removed probe_superio from v2. It has not been referenced as
svn:externals, so none of the v2 and v3 trees have probe_superio or
superiotool.
As of revision 2762, the v2 repository is still BROKEN and superiotool
doesn't appear in v3 either (checked revision 486).
Such commits are one
Hi,
I have a spare motherboard to experiment with linuxbios. I see that each
individual component of my mobo seems to be on your supported list.
http://www.giga-byte.co.uk/Support/Motherboard/BIOS_Model.aspx?ProductID=1860
Should this be straightforward?
Thanks,
Jack
--
linuxbios mailing
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:57:43PM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
I have a spare motherboard to experiment with linuxbios. I see that
each individual component of my mobo seems to be on your supported
list.
Should this be straightforward?
Mh, I wouldn't go that far. But it may be easy enough. :)
Peter Stuge a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:57:43PM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
I have a spare motherboard to experiment with linuxbios. I see that
each individual component of my mobo seems to be on your supported
list.
Should this be straightforward?
Mh, I wouldn't go that far. But
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
via. (btw, as a joke, has someone here a good friend which is tooth physician
or
radiologist to do a X-ray radiography of this board? ;-) )
OT : reverse engineering a 4+ layer pcb with a 2D X-ray may still be
tricky. I wonder how it is being done professionally ?
8
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 09:24:42PM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
But is the nForce4 really supported? Is it just another name for
MCP55?
Maybe... but it says OK on the status page.
Cool. Can you send lspci from a running system?
I did read that the DualBIOS won't get me out of trouble if I
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:44:35PM +0200, Quux wrote:
OT : reverse engineering a 4+ layer pcb with a 2D X-ray may still
be tricky. I wonder how it is being done professionally ?
Probably not at all. For testing the board is just put on a bed of
nails..
8 pin SOIC socket ar ~ ?30 compared
On 02/09/07 15:39 -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
I've been working on adding support for the m57sli to buildrom. I'm almost
there - particularly I've got filo and linux-as-a-bootloader (lab) going. Lab
has a stripped down 2.6.22.2 kernel and a tiny initrd in a 1MB rom chip (25K
to spare :),
I have a general question of compatibility for the list.
I have a system that was developed by antex electronics.
It is currently booting windows ce and has General Software's Embedded BIOS 4.3.
I have tried different linux flavors and get a kernel panic (EIP?) at boot
General Software
I think I just answered my own question...
The box has a AT27C020...
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc0570.pdf
Which is OTP (one time programmable) :(
And it does not look to me pin compatable with the other AMTEL
supported chips in a PLCC (i think that is the correct acro.)
Hello,
I almost have the system I have been woring on for so long now running
on the console (vga is next). Here is a recap of my hardware:
i82830 Northbridge
i82801db Southbridge (using i82801XX)
SMSC lpc47m192 Superio (using smscsuperio)
For some reason it keeps restarting over and over
Joseph Smith wrote:
Hello,
I almost have the system I have been woring on for so long now running
on the console (vga is next). Here is a recap of my hardware:
i82830 Northbridge
i82801db Southbridge (using i82801XX)
SMSC lpc47m192 Superio (using smscsuperio)
Great news!
For some
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Joseph Smith wrote:
Hello,
I almost have the system I have been woring on for so long now running
on the console (vga is next). Here is a recap of my hardware:
i82830 Northbridge
i82801db Southbridge (using i82801XX)
SMSC lpc47m192 Superio (using
18 matches
Mail list logo
