Uwe,
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:10, Uwe Hermann wrote:
See patch.
Btw, do we need to (or want to) enable the SMI PCI device? I guess not
as we don't use the VSA(?) Do we need it for the VSA-less audio driver?
Btw, Juergen, can you please attach a license to your photos in the
wiki? GPL
Uwe Hermann wrote::
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:44:57PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Please put generic 440 code in northbridge/, and not in mainboard/440-base/
Having two northbridge directories for the same northbridge sounds complex.
Full ack. Northbridge-specific code belongs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:44:57PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Please put generic 440 code in northbridge/, and not in mainboard/440-base/
Having two northbridge directories for the same northbridge sounds complex.
Hello All!
Looking at the lspci output I created simple patch for adding VT8233A
support. Unfortunately I can't find out what flash-chip is on my
mainboard (it's far away from me so I can perform only software
look) but maybe someone else tests whether this patch works or not?
Unfortunately guys
Hello All!
Does anybody tried to use linuxbios and LB-tools on non-x86 platforms?
There are some issues we need to fir even for compilation (not for
successful usage).
One thing I found so far is excessive usage of non-portable inb/outb
macros. For instance - inb may be emulated as folliwing:
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071019 23:39]:
This patch introduces block and sector erase routines, but does not use
them yet.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index: util/flashrom/flash.h
===
--- Config.lb (revision 0)
+++ Config.lb (revision 0)
Missing license header.
Fixed
+static void host_enable(struct device *dev)
Would
const struct device *dev
work? It looks like dev is not being modified(?)
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 20.10.2007 02:44, ron minnich wrote:
I offer the following diff and a question: can the use of in these
if expressions be wrong?
Currently it is:
if ((MIN_MOD_BANKS spd_byte) (spd_byte MAX_MOD_BANKS))
You want || because either condition
