On Tuesday 06 November 2007, yhlu wrote:
On 11/5/07, Torsten Duwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yinghai, where did you
get the routing info from?
these are all belonging to MCP internal devices esp pcie.
Documented where?
when set the pci irq routing in pci conf space carefully, the mptable
Recently the Splashtop by DeviceVM
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4383814601.html
http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/10/devicevm-launch.html
followed by Hyperspace by Phoenix have been getting attention in the
press.
I'm not sure if their investors and management feel that a closed source
On 11/2/07, Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been spinning my wheels because of a stale payload.
In the fallback directory, the payload file depends on the
../{../}*/payload.elf file. If you change that to ../../payload.lzma.elf to
retry, it won't get the new file if payload is
Author: ward
Date: 2007-11-06 17:23:38 +0100 (Tue, 06 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 53
Modified:
buildrom-devel/config/platforms/platforms.conf
Log:
Fix m57sli board name in config/platforms/platforms.conf to match new
consistent naming scheme used elsewhere in buildrom (trivial).
Signed-off-by:
-Original Message-
From: yhlu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 7:50 PM
To: David Edrich
Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] looking for a LinuxBIOS port of a 4 socket Opteron
based SuperMicro board
with HTX slot
On 11/5/07, David
* David Edrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071106 17:20]:
[David Edrich] I need a LinuxBIOS for any 4 socket Opteron (Rev F socket)
system with 1 preferably 2 HTX slots. I'm getting the idea
that there are no boards like that with LinuxBIOS yet.
The Agami Aruma is such a board.. It's the board used in
bari schrieb:
I'm not sure if their investors and management feel that a closed source
BIOS has the only hope of success in the market or if they are unaware
of LinuxBIOS.
In case of Phoenix it's probably because they have most of the necessary
code lying around already, and seem to do quite
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:25:28AM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 00:40, Torsten Duwe wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Do you still need irqpoll?
Rebuilding and rebooting right after this mail ... :-)
...now posting from it.
Hi,
after some time of abstinence I tried to build linuxbios (m57sli) on
debian-lenny
(AMD64) but failed:
gcc -m32 -nostdlib -r -o linuxbios_ram.o c_start.o mcp55_aza.o mcp55_ht.o
mcp55_pci.o uart8250_console.o mcp55_ide.o vga_console.o mainboard.o
mcp55_lpc.o mcp55_nic.o mcp55_pcie.o
Author: ward
Date: 2007-11-06 20:58:52 +0100 (Tue, 06 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 54
Modified:
buildrom-devel/config/platforms/platforms.conf
Log:
Remove debug output that slipped in during my last trivial patch (trivial).
Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Ward Vandewege
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:28:06PM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
Hi,
after some time of abstinence I tried to build linuxbios (m57sli) on
debian-lenny
(AMD64) but failed:
gcc -m32 -nostdlib -r -o linuxbios_ram.o c_start.o mcp55_aza.o mcp55_ht.o
mcp55_pci.o uart8250_console.o
Great! This fixed the issue.
Thanks,
Andi
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:25:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Does anybody have an idea what's missing/changed?
Try installing gcc-multilib package.
(Btw, it works for me on amd64 etch)
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights;
Hi!
Rudolf reported that GRUB doesn't start on LBv2 because it attempts to find
the memory map table at 0x500, and it isn't always there. For him it is at
0x530, but looking at the code it seems not to be hardcoded, but instead
right after a GDT that does live at 0x500. See:
#80: serial console in grub2 works
+---
Reporter: oxygene | Owner: oxygene
Type: enhancement |Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Hello,
unfortunately, for me flashrom still fails (I've never seen it working
on my bord with LB, factory bios works).
I still need NoDCC2.
Regards,
Andi
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:21:26PM -0500, Ward Vandewege wrote:
Yeah, thanks! Your patch also seems to have fixed the
Hi Andi,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
unfortunately, for me flashrom still fails (I've never seen it working
on my bord with LB, factory bios works).
Yeah, same here, I was wrong :/
However, I'm glad you also see the problem - it's not just my board
Patrick Georgi wrote:
bari schrieb:
I'm not sure if their investors and management feel that a closed source
BIOS has the only hope of success in the market or if they are unaware
of LinuxBIOS.
In case of Phoenix it's probably because they have most of the necessary
code lying around
#80: serial console in grub2 works
+---
Reporter: oxygene | Owner: oxygene
Type: enhancement |Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
#80: serial console in grub2 works
+---
Reporter: oxygene | Owner: oxygene
Type: enhancement |Status: reopened
Priority: major| Milestone:
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071106 21:28]:
Hi!
Rudolf reported that GRUB doesn't start on LBv2 because it attempts to find
the memory map table at 0x500, and it isn't always there. For him it is at
0x530, but looking at the code it seems not to be hardcoded, but instead
right
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:55:25AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
bios compatibility
I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
understood by all. :)
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-11-07 01:19:42 +0100 (Wed, 07 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2947
Modified:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/include/device/pci_ids.h
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dai_g/reset.c
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/southbridge/intel/esb6300/esb6300.c
On 07/11/07 01:12 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:55:25AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
bios compatibility
I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
understood by all. :)
Except of course, the
Yeah. Too bad I no longer have the T43p. :(
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=20958
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:19:31PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
understood by all. :)
Except of course, the e820 table parser in the kernel... :)
Not neccessarily. Only if
On 07/11/07 01:54 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:19:31PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
understood by all. :)
Except of course, the e820 table
Well, I hope this is it. My alix1c now works very well. I think the
IRQs are right.
Thanks again to Marc Jones for clearing me up on IRQ tables.
Attached.
ron
Final set of changes to make Alix1c work.
Comment out ram test in early startup.
make the debug print in lx/raminit.c a debug print,
I did a config for the 2891 with LAB, but all I see in deploy is this:
ls -l deploy/
total 7280
-rw-r--r-- 1 rminnich rminnich 905680 2007-11-06 19:36 bzImage
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rminnich rminnich 272384 2007-11-06 19:38 initrd.uncompressed
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rminnich rminnich 879963 2007-11-06 19:38
ron minnich wrote:
Well, I hope this is it. My alix1c now works very well. I think the
IRQs are right.
Thanks again to Marc Jones for clearing me up on IRQ tables.
Attached.
ron
-default IRQ_SLOT_COUNT=9
+default IRQ_SLOT_COUNT=7
This should be IRQ_SLOT_COUNT=5
Otherwise it looks
29 matches
Mail list logo
