Not yet. There is no support for the CN700 north bridge as of yet. We
are hoping to have CN700 north bridge support soon.
-Adam Talbot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello LinuxBIOS mailing list
>
> I am wondering if this board http://www.ibase-i.com.tw/ib798.htm would
> work with Li
I have two of these motherboard.
Purchased under then name PCChips V21G V1.0C
Have been looking for some time to load linuxbios on them. All the
hardware information is below. Any one playing around with these, be
careful, flashrom hangs on these boards, and I have had no luck at
tracking down th
Strange, GCC just finished compiling. No errors and I have the system
running i686 native.
I tuned with CFLAGS="-Os -march=i686 -pipe"
-Adam
ron minnich wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> You shouldn't use 686 - these are i586 instruction sets. But there are
I have a wyse term 3150se system that I would like to install linuxbios
on. Does any know the status of the CS55535? Also, what type of Geode
is this, can I uses i686 with GCC, or will that give me errors? Trying
to figure out what Cflags I can use.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags
livecd ~
-Ron
For a quite case I would advise any thing from Lian-LI. I like these
cases. All the edges are sanded so you dont cut your self up, when
trying to work inside. They are also VERY quite.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E1682099
For a quite power supply, try this. No mo
What must the BIOS initialize in order to have Linux boot, if the kernel
is the payload. I know that the dram controller must be up, but what
else? Super IO is nice for debug reasons, but is it required?. South
bridge? Does the modern 2.6 have enough brains to start the south bridge?
-Adam
What must the BIOS initialize in order to have Linux boot, if the kernel
is the payload. I know that the dram controller must be up, but what
else? Super IO is nice for debug reasons, but is it required?. South
bridge? Does the modern 2.6 have enough brains to start the south bridge?
-Adam
no, sorry
-Adam
ron minnich wrote:
> do you have URL for 8237 docs?
>
> ron
>
>
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
+VT8237 boards, I would like a different chip, just to prove it
is not the chip(s).
-Adam Talbot
v21g flashrom # ./flashrom -r backup.bin
Calibrating delay loop... ok
No LinuxBIOS table found.
Found chipset "VT8237": Enabling flash write... OK.
W39V040B found at physical address: 0xfff8
Fla
-Ron
Just tried the Jetway board. Flashed just fine. Seems to be a problem
with the PCChips board. What should I start checking?
-Adam
ron minnich wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ron, here is what is hiding in MTRR, explanation?
>
=0x1ef0 ( 495MB), size= 1MB: write-through, count=1
ron minnich wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Have three motherboards running cn700, VT8237 chips set. All three
>> boards have W39V040BPZ bios chips. I can not program them with
&g
Yep, my jetway has that. It is off. But I have not tried flashrom on
that board. Can not seem to get the stock BIOS to boot from USB. The
other two boards are PCChips V21G V1.0C
-Adam
Corey Osgood wrote:
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> Have three motherboards running cn700, VT8237 chi
Have three motherboards running cn700, VT8237 chips set. All three
boards have W39V040BPZ bios chips. I can not program them with
flashrom. Flashrom see the chip as W39V040B. Flashrom start on the
flash and just sits there. When flashed with the -V option I can see
the memory address is not ch
What is the current status of the via vt82c686 southbridge?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Let me just ask the very dumb question. Does the keyboard work with the
stock BIOS? Have you tried the stock BIOS since you had this problem?
Just a sanity check.
-Adam
Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After commenting this with Uwe on IRC, he said I should ask to the list to
> see if someone kn
5PM -0700, Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> An idea that I wanted to bounce around. KVM over IP, fully
>> embedded in LinuxBIOS?
>>
>
> LB is removed/forgotten by design once the payload is started.
>
> SSH on management VLAN instead?
>
>
> //Peter
An idea that I wanted to bounce around. KVM over IP, fully embedded in
LinuxBIOS? In a production class server room, there are mainly two ways
to gain video console on a server. Crash cart, or a KVM over IP
solution. It has been proven that LinuxBIOS can do console over IP...
How much of a
Great to hear!
-Adam
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> Yes, c7, cn700, vt8237r. No video yet and USB is causing kernel
>> warnings, but I can log in and use the system through serial.
>>
>> -Corey
>>
>>
>
> you rock!
>
>
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbi
I like the concept, but I think I may have a problem... Any ideas?
http://www.batbuilds.com/webfolders/problem.jpg
:-)
-Adam Talbot
Randall Philipson wrote:
> I don't have an account so I guess I can't edit the wiki, but anyone can feel
> free to add the stuff, or if desire
Yes, Please put that on the wiki. VERY COOL idea.
-Adam Talbot
ron minnich wrote:
> can we get this on the wiki? It's a neat approach.
>
> thanks
>
> ron
>
> On 4/10/07, Randall Philipson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've implemented an ide
Wow, that is a great history. Any chance to put that on the wiki?
-Adam Talbot
Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:22AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>
>> I asked about the 3.3V vs 5V roms, and i only got further confusion...
>>
>
> I'll
I have compiled memtest with serial support, but when I boot it from
grub, it only runs at 9600 baud. Am I missing a compile option? What
am I missing, what do I need?
-Adam
Grub.conf
default 0
timeout 5
serial --unit=0 --speed=115200
terminal --timeout=10 serial console
title=Gentoo Linux 2.
Web site update? Should I update the site?
Corey Osgood wrote:
> Here's the updated version of this patch, which from what I can see
> works perfectly fine, every boot. The description, once again:
>
> This patch is just for initial serial output for the Via vt82c686(a/b)
> southbridge, no more an
No such luck. I only have the current SVN, with no changes.
-Adam
sanjay tiwary wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> i guess u have a working copy for the LinuxBIOSv2 in which you have
> incorpoarted change for the support for VT8605 Northbridge.
> I have a similar board which is having VT8605 for northbridge.My
Has any one looked into adding linuxbios support for the CN700 and
VT8237R north, and south bridges?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
South bridge? or companion chip?
-Adam
Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:01:07PM -0800, Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>
>> Looking for any desktop class northbridge supported by linuxbios?
>> Looking for a cheap socket 939 motherboard, in the mini-ATX form factor,
Looking for any desktop class northbridge supported by linuxbios?
Looking for a cheap socket 939 motherboard, in the mini-ATX form factor,
that can support linuxbios.
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
What are the current supported Nvidia northbridges?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Trying to help fill one
of the Linuxbios documentation hole.
-Adam
Adam Talbot wrote:
> Looking for an update to the "Supported Chipsets and Devices" page on
> linuxbios.org
> I am more then happy to update the page, but I need a list of the newly
> supported/WIP chips.
ow we have support
for may AMD cpus and VIA cpu's, what all do we support?
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
I have an embedded system with serial console, but its inverted. I
would normally use a hardware hex inverter chip, but currently dont have
any sitting around. Is there a way in linux/minicom to do hex inverting
on the fly? Or to capture and then convert?
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing
What part are we looking at?
Cost per part?
Do you take paypal?
-Adam
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> ron minnich wrote:
>
>> some time ago I offered to do a group buy of the 16 Mbit parts. I'm
>> still willing to do that if we can pick the right part and get the
>> people together. So, again, what's
Do we need to update the website to reflect the state of the the via
vt82c686a, under the "Supported Chipsets and Devices"
-Adam
Corey Osgood wrote:
> Okay, looking further into the archives, and into the very /origins/
> of these files, in the original freebios cvs (on sourceforge), it
> appe
Thats good, its just a simple test to see if memory is set up correctly.
-Adam
Jon Dufresne wrote:
> I did run a memtest and after 1 pass I received 0 errors. Should I run
> it longer than one pass?
>
> Jon
>
> On 12/13/06, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Point filo to boot off of memtest. I would look at memory. Just an
idea, and its an easy test.
-Adam
Jon Dufresne wrote:
> Thanks, Uwe.
>
> I used the 82801dbm as a starting ground. I've already had to change a
> few things such as device IDs.
>
> I know something somewhere isn't right because
Ouch... well that just shot me down in flames. But, VERY good point.
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061211 23:39]:
>
>> My current system takes about 3 seconds for Linuxbios, then 2 more for
>> kernel, to the suspend2 code, then 7~12s
Well, I am very glad to see all the input on this idea. Lets see if I
can add some info and sort what we have.
Current speeds.
My current system takes about 3 seconds for Linuxbios, then 2 more for
kernel, to the suspend2 code, then 7~12sec depending on how much
compression I am using on the susp
ots to comp theory and nothing useful. So I can give you
the theory and hope its a good idea, but I will not be much good past
that. Is this a workable idea?
-Adam Talbot
ron minnich wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Like always I am looking for a fas
d
it be to build in a "suspend to disk" function into linuxbios? I could
see a great use for this in laptops running linuxbios, like the OLPC
project.
Just an idea.
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
gt;
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
> On 12/7/06, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I think I was the last person to work on the 855
>> over a year ago. I was never able to get it running. I would start
>> with getting the system to boot using a
#x27;t realize there was more than what
> the guide mentions.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
> On 12/7/06, Adam Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just asking the dumb question. Is the 855 chip set supported?
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> Jon Dufresne wro
Just asking the dumb question. Is the 855 chip set supported?
-Adam
Jon Dufresne wrote:
>>> Define the PIC device twice with the proper ID's but describe only
>>> once the VGA BIOS.
>>>
>>> Maybe then it will show up with LB.
>>>
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. Is t
Looks like the Geode LX line is well supported. How much work am I
looking at in order to load LinuxBIOS on an iBase mb500?
http://www.ibase.com.tw/mb500.htm
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
-Andy
Currently the is no support for the vt8237.
What would it take to support? Some one who has a few weeks to work on it.
I spent a few weeks, but was never able to get the console running.
With out that, I had no way of doing debugging. My board does not have
any PCI slots, so I was unable t
-Matt
Steve G was able to provide me with the correct doc.
-Adam Talbot
Samet, Matt wrote:
>I looked online for a while and could not find the VT8237 datasheet. I
>tried asking VIA for the doc (they have a form you can fill out for the
>NDA) but they didn't respond either.
>
enughf to the VT8235, but I guess I am wrong. OK, time to start
trying to add support for the VT8237 south bridge. Does any one have
access to the Docs for the VT8237?
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
experiences. It's hard to find experiences from stuff that worked.
>
> note: Seaching for the VGA issue, it seems I should take the VGA BIOS
> from some specific version of VIA's BIOS...
>
> Regards,
>
> Leon Woestenberg.
>
>
>
> [LinuxBIOS] Stat
Is the current epia-m code running?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
I am really stuck on this one. "XIP_ROM_BASE is not a multiple of
XIP_ROM_SIZE" Working on the epia-m with linuxbios rev 2100. I have set
XIP_ROM_SIZE=0x2 in my config.ld and keep getting that error. So I
change the size and get a not divisible by 2 error. With out the option
I get the sa
Where would i go to by new bios chips?
like:
SST39SF040, SST39SF020?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
How do I resize a stock bios?
The current rom is 512kb and so is the flash chip. I have a smaller
flash chip that I would like to use to free up the big chip. This means
i need to make a 512kb rom file fit on a 256kb rom :-). Is this even
possible?
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbio
the same problem?
-Aadm
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> Speed in ns:
>> What controls that? Can I set/change the access speed to my "bios chip"?
>
>
> The timing of the Flash BIOS read and write cycles are hardwired into
> the chipset and clock synthesizer. At mos
e about is boot time and ever 0.10
seconds I can save, counts.
-Adam
Peter Stuge wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:41:02PM -0800, Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>
>>Fun easy question.
>>Messing about with my new board, and have an easy question. So I have
>>both the SST 39
Fun easy question.
Messing about with my new board, and have an easy question. So I have
both the SST 39SF020 and the 39SF040 flash chip. My payload is just
filo; so I can fit Linuxbios on the 256Kb or the 512Kb flash chip. Is
there any reason to use the 512Kb?
Faster, slower, any thing else l
-Linuxbios
In my normal hunting of e-bay I found a nice embedded board for a good
price, I just bought one :-) I do not think Linuxbios will be hard to
port on to this board.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6845741668
-Adam
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
ht
How is it on boot time? How long does linuxbios take before it gets to
the payload?
-Adam
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> What geode board are you working with? The GX2 board? Price?
>
>
> we're working with the lippert fastrunner here.
>
>
What geode board are you working with? The GX2 board? Price?
-Adam Talbot
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
-Ron
Little bug fix's and its working
# ./a.out
c ff
#include
#include
main(){
unsigned char c;
ioperm(0x2E, 1, 1);
c = inb(0x2e);
printf("c %02x\n", c);
}
-Adam
Adam Talbot wrote:
>-Ron
>Just a guess. uchar = unsigned char???
>-
-Ron
Just a guess. uchar = unsigned char???
-Adam
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> I am missing an inclue or define statment...
>>
> oh, that code I sent is crap.
>
> I did not know you wanted the full thing.
>
> #include
> #include
>
&
I am missing an inclue or define statment...
3_5_proto#gcc test.c
/tmp/ccwX6c0l.o: In function `main':
test.c:(.text+0x24): undefined reference to `inb'
test.c:(.text+0x30): undefined reference to `inb'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
>
chip superio/via/vt1211
device pnp 2e.2 on # Com1
io 0x60 = 0x3f8
irq 0x70 = 4
end
Adam Talbot wrote:
> -Ron
> Well,
-Ron
Well, I just got my code compiling. But I have nothing on the console.
What settings/files would you advise I check. Serial debug is set at 9,
but I am seeing nothing. Ideas?
-Adam
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> -Ron
>> To day I will sound like a n
-Ron
To day I will sound like a n00b. VSA?
-Adam
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> Currently trying to port the EBC3410, but if I could find a small GX2
>> board for a good price I would switch. My project is all about boot
>> time and that built in DD
Currently trying to port the EBC3410, but if I could find a small GX2
board for a good price I would switch. My project is all about boot time
and that built in DDR memory controler REALY speeds things up.
My current board.
http://www.bcmcom.com/bcm_product_ebc3410.htm
-Adam Talbot
P.S. irq
-Ron
LinuxBIOSv2-2158 can compile the epia, but I do not know it it boots,
have no such board to test on. If this helps any, here is my tree. The
epia-m does not compile.
http://www.batbuilds.com/webfolders/LinuxBIOSv2-2158.tar.bz2
-Adam
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
>if anyone out there has a copy
Humm, So I have the irq_table.c in src/mainboard/bcm/ebc3610 am I
missing something, some where else? Where should I look.
-Adam Talbot
linuxbios_ram.o: In function `write_tables':
: undefined reference to `write_pirq_routing_table'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit sta
would be a good starting point? Is the vt8605 similar to the
> (supported) vt8601?
>
> What about the vt82c686b?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:33:26PM -0800, Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>> So I have my new embedded board. It is running a chip set t
ble_dev,
>};
>
>===>
>
>struct chip_operations northbridge_via_vt8605_6_ops = {
> CHIP_NAME("VIA vt8605_6 Northbridge")
> .enable_dev = enable_dev,
>};
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Still trying to build Linux bios on my new board. Have solved allot of
compile errors, but this one had me stuck. "undefined reference to
`northbridge_via_vt8605_6_ops`". As best I can tell this is coming from
c_start.s. The only peace of code I have with that line in it is
/root/LinuxBIOSv2
Cool, I will start there. Thank you
-Adam
Michal Szwaczko wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:33:26PM -0800, Adam Talbot wrote:
>
>
>
>>Looking for some doc's on the linuxbios web page about were to start and
>>what files tie in to the build, and where. Can s
So I have my new embedded board. It is running a chip set that is not
supported, yet. I have all the doc's, that I think I will need. I
would like to start trying to add support for the vt8605/vt8606 based
board(s).
Looking for some doc's on the linuxbios web page about were to start and
wh
71 matches
Mail list logo
