Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] e820 table correction

2007-02-06 Thread Andi Kleen
On Monday 05 February 2007 17:23, Roman Kononov wrote: On 02/04/2007 12:33 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Which means we want to either delete the System ROM reservation, perform the System ROM reservation after other reservations from the e820 map, or improve the error handling. What is

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] e820 table correction

2007-02-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sunday 04 February 2007 03:39, yhlu wrote: commit dbf9272e863bf4b17ee8e3c66c26682b2061d40d Author: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 26 10:52:36 2006 +0200 [PATCH] Don't force reserve the 640k-1MB range Ok, but if that breaks LinuxBios then the problem is clearly

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] e820 table correction

2007-02-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sunday 04 February 2007 11:45, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: On Sunday 04 February 2007 03:39, yhlu wrote: commit dbf9272e863bf4b17ee8e3c66c26682b2061d40d Author: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 26 10:52:36 2006 +0200 [PATCH] Don't force reserve the 640k

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] e820 table correction

2007-02-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Saturday 03 February 2007 01:17, Lu, Yinghai wrote: Actually that is because of Andi's patch cause the problem. What patch? -Andi -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [linux-usb-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86_64 Early usb debug port support.

2006-12-06 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:01, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Ok due to popular demands here is the slightly fixed patch that works on both i386 and x86_64. For the i386 version you must not have HIGHMEM64G enabled. I just rolled it all into one patch as I'm to lazy to transmit all 3 of

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [linux-usb-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86_64 Early usb debug port support.

2006-12-06 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 21:43, Lu, Yinghai wrote: -Original Message- From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:31 AM Also for usb console keep should be made default because the output won't be duplicated. Still need to tx_read

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [linux-usb-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86_64 Early usb debug port support.

2006-12-06 Thread Andi Kleen
\ - Host, to which that console connects (through the debug device); runs usb_debug, much like any other usb-serial device My understanding was that the client could run in user space only on top of libusb. It's analagous to debugging an embedded box using a serial console with a

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [linux-usb-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86_64 Early usb debug port support.

2006-12-06 Thread Andi Kleen
However I suppose it would be ok to switch Eric's code between early pci access and locked one once the PCI subsystem is up and running. Just don't forget bust_spinlocks() No pci access on that path. Hmm good point. Ok ignore that then. keep should be default then. -Andi --