On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:16:22 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:22:54PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > No, I didn't go that far. My concern was simply that strncpy is
> > misused. strncpy doesn't null-terminate the string it copies, so you
> > end
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:54:24 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > We tell users to use isadump for that. As isadump is part of the
> > lm-sensors package, we can be reasonably certain that it is available
> > to the users
me, too, of course :)
Thanks you. I'm all for sharing the information.
Two things I've noticed while trying superiotool:
* The human-readable dump of my F71805FG chip includes:
27=20
29=00
2a=ff
2b=ff
That's not exactly human-readable by my definition ;)
* When dumping a Winb
; --
>
> ''
>
> enable SPD
> outb_port($2E,$87);
> outb_port($2E,$87);
> outb_port($2E,7);
> outb_port($2F,7);
> outb_port($2E,$F2);
> temp = inb_port($2F);
> outb_port($2E,$F2);
> outb_port($2F,(temp & 0xFC) | 0x1);
> outb_port($2E,2);
> temp2 = inb_port($2F);
> outb_port($2F,temp2 | 0x2);
> outb_port($2E,$AA);
>
> disable SPD
> outb_port($2E,$87);
> outb_port($2E,$87);
> outb_port($2E,7);
> outb_port($2F,7);
> outb_port($2E,$F2);
> outb_port($2F,temp);
> outb_port($2E,$AA);
>
Thanks for the information. I really wonder why Asus tries that hard to
hide some I2C/SMBus devices behind gates. I fail to see any benefit in
doing so, and it makes both the hardware more expensive and the code
more complex.
--
Jean Delvare
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
oard is P3B, newest P4B.
Is this information public? We don't yet support I2C/SMBus
multiplexing, but when we do, if we have the information, we can add
support for these boards.
--
Jean Delvare
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios