On 13/06/07 17:51 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: I have not tested this on hardware. But I can bet Marc has :-)
This just convinces me that DRAM really is black magic :-)
r2722. And yes - it is all black magic, which is why Marc wears a
black
Indrek Kruusa wrote:
Could it be that setup for one LX board (amd/norwitch) does something very
special that prevents this LB ROM to run (to some extent) on another LX
board
(artecgroup/dbe61)? It stops at postcode 0x10 (Entry into protected mode). I
suppose that whatever LX target rom
On 5/21/07, Indrek Kruusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be that setup for one LX board (amd/norwitch) does something very
special that prevents this LB ROM to run (to some extent) on another LX board
(artecgroup/dbe61)? It stops at postcode 0x10 (Entry into protected mode). I
suppose that
Could it be that setup for one LX board (amd/norwitch) does something very
special that prevents this LB ROM to run (to some extent) on another LX board
(artecgroup/dbe61)? It stops at postcode 0x10 (Entry into protected mode). I
suppose that whatever LX target rom should be able to reach at
Indrek Kruusa wrote:
Could it be that setup for one LX board (amd/norwitch) does something very
special that prevents this LB ROM to run (to some extent) on another LX board
(artecgroup/dbe61)? It stops at postcode 0x10 (Entry into protected mode). I
suppose that whatever LX target rom
* Steve Spano [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070507 15:58]:
I have seen a lot of chatter regarding the GeodeLX linux bios.
Where is the current release version/patch list for the GeodeLX bios.
All required code is in the current development tree. See
http://www.linuxbios.org/Download_LinuxBIOS on how
On 02/05/07 20:50 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Don't do it. Thanks. Removing working code is not a good option, and
there may still be people with rev_a/btest boards out there.
Also, the code is very useful as a reference for other boards etc.
There's no indication that code is actually working -
On 02/05/07 21:12 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
yes, it is companies and organizations that ship distros and turn on
switches that require things like stack checking, and hence break
linuxbios builds on certain distros. They don't seem to realize that
all the world is NOT an application ...
let me say it differently. I think if we want to target OLPC, we ought
to do it from V3, not V2. I'm still in favor of dropping the current
code and forcing a 'rework' of the code.
Get people into working with V3. It is so much nicer ...
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
On 03/05/07 08:52 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
let me say it differently. I think if we want to target OLPC, we ought
to do it from V3, not V2. I'm still in favor of dropping the current
code and forcing a 'rework' of the code.
To me, the current OLPC code is the worst possible example of a Geode
Jordan Crouse wrote:
I have no problem at all with somebody porting V3 to work on the OLPC -
I hope they do it for every Geode platform they can get their hands on.
But perpetrating iffy code that will never be used in production for a board
that will never *be* in production to me is silly.
* Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070503 18:01]:
I have no problem at all with somebody porting V3 to work on the OLPC -
I hope they do it for every Geode platform they can get their hands on.
But perpetrating iffy code that will never be used in production for a board
that will never *be* in
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:20:14PM -0400, Richard Smith wrote:
then we end up dropping half the tree. This is not something
unique to the OLPC and GX.
Good point.
If we drop code then for someone to go look at the olpc stuff they
will have to figure out what revision of the tree had the
On 04/05/07 02:27 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:15:48PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Here is a refresh of the Geode LX patches based on the comments from
the list. This set also includes the patches to add the GPL licenses
to some of the files that Jordan posted. This
On 02/05/07 01:37 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
===
--- LinuxBIOSv2.orig/src/cpu/amd/model_lx/cpubug.c 2007-04-30
15:25:27.0 -0600
+++ LinuxBIOSv2/src/cpu/amd/model_lx/cpubug.c 2007-05-01
12:09:15.0
One LX port has been done, I'm doing another, and you would hence be
the 3rd or 4th. You have contacted AMD I assume concerning
redistribution rights for the LX VSA? You are going to need to do
that.
The build depends on what you put on the board. The best thing you
could do would be to talk to
on the output of the CS5536 to
store the linux image, full fillsystem, bios, etc
Thanks!
Steve Spano
FLE
-Original Message-
From: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:50 PM
To: Steve Spano
Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] geode LX
One LX
17 matches
Mail list logo
