Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 01:14, Richard Smith wrote: Great. I'll have reason to do some linuxbios hacking soon. I purchased some GIGABYTE GA-M57SLI-S4 setups to build a Multi-TB RAID server. Parts should arrive next week. One goes into service with stock BIOS to get going ASAP and the other gets

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Richard Smith
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: For SPI flash size, the limitation is not how much the chipset can support, but how much the SPI translation feature in the IT8716F can support. Are you talking about LCP reads - SPI reads translation? If so I only need that for the initial boot. After that I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 19:34, Richard Smith wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: For SPI flash size, the limitation is not how much the chipset can support, but how much the SPI translation feature in the IT8716F can support. Are you talking about LCP reads - SPI reads translation? Yes. If so I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Richard Smith
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: If so I only need that for the initial boot. After that I can issue SPI read commands directly to the device. Which is a little bit slow/inefficient. I suspect that using a USB storage device (together with early USB initialization) will give you better

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Al Boldi
Uwe Hermann wrote: That would be great. If you stick one DIMM in slot 0 it should boot right away (yes, this will be fixed to support all combinations), just use either of the 440BX targets in svn. Except for 4-5 lines of code per target they're all the same. I may be able to help out here.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Richard Smith
Al Boldi wrote: I may be able to help out here. I have a GigaByte i440bx board with a dual-bios. There are two physical non-socketed chips, but the fallback logic is software conntrolled. Oh. I don't care about bricking. My boards have sockets and unbricking things is my specialty. I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:04:59AM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: I may be able to help out here. I have a GigaByte i440bx board with a dual-bios. There are two physical non-socketed chips, but the fallback logic is software conntrolled. Oh. I don't care about bricking. My boards have

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Gregg C Levine
] Remove Bitworks IMS Al Boldi wrote: I may be able to help out here. I have a GigaByte i440bx board with a dual-bios. There are two physical non-socketed chips, but the fallback logic is software conntrolled. Oh. I don't care about bricking. My boards have sockets and unbricking things

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Richard Smith
Uwe Hermann wrote: functions in lib/spd.c and some 440BX-specific stuff in the resp. raminit.c. Will post soon. 82371EB southbridge which the 440BX boards use. I'll finish up that one first an post it after a few tests. Great. I'll have reason to do some linuxbios hacking soon. I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Peter Stuge
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:34:18AM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: I'm relatively sure the dual-bios solution will not work in this case, as it's software-controlled (but other may have more information). Correct, any BIOS failsafe in software is out of play once LB is in the flash chip. IIRC

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:14:08PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: Great. I'll have reason to do some linuxbios hacking soon. I purchased some GIGABYTE GA-M57SLI-S4 setups to build a Multi-TB RAID server. Parts should arrive next week. One goes into service with stock BIOS to get going ASAP

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-28 Thread Al Boldi
Uwe Hermann wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:39:33PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: I may be able to help out here. I have a GigaByte i440bx board with a Which board exactly? The GIGABYTE GA-6BXC is currently supported. GIGABYTE GA-BX2000. AwardBIOS 2A69KG0E. dual-bios. There are two physical

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-27 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:39:54AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:31:14PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: What 440bx based boards now work? tyan/s1846 Uh, that and ASUS P2B ASUS P2B-F ASUS P3B-F A-Trend ATC-6220 AZZA PT-6IBD Biostar M6TBA Compaq Deskpro EN SFF P600

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-27 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:31:14PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: That said, I still have some boards and I would sure love to see proper video pop out sometime before I die. It is the only project of mine that outright failed because of technical problems I was not able to solve. The scars

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-27 Thread Richard Smith
Uwe Hermann wrote: Maybe I'll take a Sunday afternoon and try to boot the code one of them on the IMS boards I have. That would be great. If you stick one DIMM in slot 0 it should boot right away (yes, this will be fixed to support all combinations), just use either of the 440BX targets

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-26 Thread Richard Smith
Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070524 20:55]: I tend to agree, but I'd like to hear the opinion of Richard (CC'd). One drawback Ive discovered of gmail is that it will filter out duplicates so a cc: and a subscription to the list means that I only get one copy and it

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-26 Thread Peter Stuge
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:31:14PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: What 440bx based boards now work? tyan/s1846 //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-05-25 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070524 20:55]: I tend to agree, but I'd like to hear the opinion of Richard (CC'd). Well, reason 1 and 3 are quite surely not enough to remove it, maybe not even reason 2. The reason why I agree that it can be removed is that it's almost completely copy+paste

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:20:15PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote: Well, as there seems to be a lot of cleaning up going on lately, might as well add this to the docket. The attached patch removes the Bitworks IMS, as 1) there's no video support for it, 2) no one objected when this was discussed