Re: [LinuxBIOS] [v3][PATCH] have a static initram improvements.

2007-07-20 Thread ron minnich
Hey, btw, I realized a way to do the vector table that might work well over time. I think I mentioned this before, but I'll mention it again. Rather than have LB define the vector table in a mainboard-independent way, which will get harder as we add more mainboards, have the MAINBOARD code define

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [v3][PATCH] have a static initram improvements.

2007-07-20 Thread Marc Jones
Stefan Reinauer wrote: * ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070720 06:41]: Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you wish to commit. I think this is acceptable for the short term. ron I will work some more on this. I added the stuff for amd norwich, too, yesterday. It required

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [v3][PATCH] have a static initram improvements.

2007-07-20 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:24:59PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote: yesterday. It required post_code, too. So I made an extra file post_code.c (post_code was in stage1.c before) post_code() should be a macro in post_code.h. It is small enough it should always be inline. Yes/No? Not sure - it may

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [v3][PATCH] have a static initram improvements.

2007-07-19 Thread Stefan Reinauer
This is a simple example how to statically link printk into initram. It grows initram by incredible 2000 bytes here. So yes, this is a solution for now. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: mainboard/emulation/qemu-x86/Makefile

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [v3][PATCH] have a static initram improvements.

2007-07-19 Thread ron minnich
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you wish to commit. I think this is acceptable for the short term. ron On 7/19/07, Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a simple example how to statically link printk into initram. It grows initram by incredible 2000 bytes here. So