Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-07 Thread Steve Isaacs
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:11 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:59:21AM -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote: I found these in mainboard/momentum/apache and am wondering if I can use them as is for my board. Where is this from? There's no such board in LinuxBIOS, AFAICS. I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-07 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:59:21AM -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote: I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? ## Boot linux from IDE default CONFIG_IDE=1 default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1

[LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-04 Thread Steve Isaacs
I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? ## Boot linux from IDE default CONFIG_IDE=1 default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1 default CONFIG_FS_ISO9660=1 default CONFIG_FS_FAT=1 default

Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-04 Thread Corey Osgood
Steve Isaacs wrote: I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? ## Boot linux from IDE default CONFIG_IDE=1 default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1 default CONFIG_FS_ISO9660=1 default