Jordan Crouse wrote:
On 14/08/07 21:28 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Is it worth adding rdmsr/wrmsr to flashrom?
Is there a better option?
Nope. You need MSR acess, and thats the only way to get it from
userspace.
Is it
Peter Stuge wrote:
enable_flash_geodelx() yes.
Please send a patch! Check out
http://linuxbios.org/Development_Guidelines
Please have a look at the attached patch.
I've tested it first with a bunch of printf lines in between the
read/write steps and it looked good. The 'production' version
Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
enable_flash_geodelx() yes.
Please send a patch! Check out
http://linuxbios.org/Development_Guidelines
Please have a look at the attached patch.
I've tested it first with a bunch of printf lines in between the
read/write steps and it
On 15/08/07 11:21 +0200, Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Jordan Crouse wrote:
On 14/08/07 21:28 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Is it worth adding rdmsr/wrmsr to flashrom?
Is there a better option?
Nope. You need MSR acess, and thats the
Jordan Crouse wrote:
How would you call the enable_flash function in chipset_enable? E.g.
enable_flash_cs5536 or enable_flash_geodelx ?
I vote for enabled_flash_cs5536.
hmmm, my very first version used enable_flash_cs5536. ;-) I changed it
for the patch I submitted.
Well, Peter and you
On 15/08/07 18:28 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
enable_flash_geodelx() yes.
Please send a patch! Check out
http://linuxbios.org/Development_Guidelines
Please have a look at the attached patch.
I've tested it first with a bunch
* Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070815 16:43]:
the rdmsr instruction won't work in ring 3, unfortunately.
There is a way to access the MSRs through a VSA virtual register, but I'm
loath to mention it, because it makes me feel all icky.
oops. ioperm() is not enough?
How are rdmsr/wrmsr done
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:16:39PM +0200, Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Please send a patch! Check out
http://linuxbios.org/Development_Guidelines
Please have a look at the attached patch.
Please add a Signed-off-by line as per guidelines, otherwise we cannot
commit the patch.
Uwe.
--
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:36:15PM +0200, Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Jordan Crouse wrote:
I vote for enabled_flash_cs5536.
Well, Peter and you should agree an something.
I prefer geodelx because that's where the 1808 MSR seems to be - it's
in the LX databook, and it tells the memory controller
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:16:39PM +0200, Ingmar Schraub wrote:
Please have a look at the attached patch.
Thanks!
+ unsigned char wrbuf[] = { 0x00, 0xbf, 0xf7, 0x10, 0x02, 0x80, 0xff,
0x22};
..
+ lseek64(fd_msr, (off64_t)addr, SEEK_SET);
+ read(fd_msr, buf, 8);
+
Hi
I am using flashrom to upgrade the BIOS on AMD Geode db800 motherboard.
I am getting the following error
EEPROM/flash device not found.
Please suggest me some pointers to solve the problem.
Regards.
Pratish Ganguly
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:37:24PM +0530, pratish ganguly wrote:
Hi
I am using flashrom to upgrade the BIOS on AMD Geode db800
motherboard. I am getting the following error
EEPROM/flash device not found.
Please suggest me some pointers to solve the problem.
Please see the ALIX thread.
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:37:24PM +0530, pratish ganguly wrote:
Hi
I am using flashrom to upgrade the BIOS on AMD Geode db800
motherboard. I am getting the following error
EEPROM/flash device not found.
Please suggest me some pointers to solve the problem.
Please
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Is it worth adding rdmsr/wrmsr to flashrom?
Is there a better option?
Is it neccessary to always write all 64 bits of the MSR by the way?
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
On 14/08/07 21:28 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Is it worth adding rdmsr/wrmsr to flashrom?
Is there a better option?
Nope. You need MSR acess, and thats the only way to get it from
userspace.
Is it neccessary to always write all 64
15 matches
Mail list logo
