* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070201 02:33]:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:26:45AM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Patch attached.
Forgot the sign-off. New patch.
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and applied.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.:
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:45:53AM -0500, Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Ok, here's what I came up with for a Solaris 10 patch.
Could all of the defines be compressed into one place? Maybe one
mem.c per system and defines controlling the build process?
Am I being overzealous about
checks to disable it for SunOS.
Thanks,
Adam
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaufman, Adam
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:00 PM
To: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS Solaris Dev
Awesome! I
Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Ok, here’s what I came up with for a Solaris 10 patch. I don’t know that
it’s the best way, but I tried to make somewhat clean. Feel free to
rewrite/suggest anything. Note that Solaris 10 removed the ability to
compile libc static, and I don’t know if we think it’s worth
Oops. Sorry. Here we go.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:58 AM
To: Kaufman, Adam
Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS Solaris Dev
Kaufman, Adam
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:45:53AM -0500, Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Ok, here's what I came up with for a Solaris 10 patch.
Could all of the defines be compressed into one place? Maybe one
mem.c per system and defines controlling the build process?
Am I being overzealous about portability?
Also, it
Hey guys. My company has been looking at using LinuxBIOS for some of our
products. Since a fair amount of our customers are using Solaris, we are
interested in getting involved with that effort. I've seen a few
references to porting the flashrom utility to Solaris, which would be a
good priority
I don't see a solaris port as a huge problem. flashrom just uses mmap
and solaris has that.
If you want to try a make and see what happens, I'd like to hear how it goes.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:44:05PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I don't see a solaris port as a huge problem. flashrom just uses mmap
and solaris has that.
If you want to try a make and see what happens, I'd like to hear how it goes.
Just a short note: if you build flashrom without having the
at errno(6):No such device or address
Ideas?
Thanks,
-ak
-Original Message-
From: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:44 PM
To: Kaufman, Adam
Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS Solaris Dev
I don't see a solaris port
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:16:32PM -0500, Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Well, I had to do a bit of messing around, but I got both pciutils and
flashrom to compile on my Solaris 10 box. My biggest concern was the
/dev/mem wouldn't allow the same access we get on linux... here's what
I get:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:42:43PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:44:05PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I don't see a solaris port as a huge problem. flashrom just uses mmap
and solaris has that.
If you want to try a make and see what happens,
Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Well, I had to do a bit of messing around, but I got both pciutils and
flashrom to compile on my Solaris 10 box. My biggest concern was the
/dev/mem wouldn't allow the same access we get on linux... here's what
I get:
bash-3.00# ./flashrom
Calibrating delay loop... ok
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 31/01/2007 20:41
To: Kaufman, Adam
Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS Solaris Dev
Kaufman, Adam wrote:
Well, I had to do a bit of messing around, but I got both pciutils and
flashrom
14 matches
Mail list logo
