On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:37:27PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On 6/12/07, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/07, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A device tree (not list) in code that
* is seeded by the mainboard dts, which lists all devices
* has device options set from
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:45:30AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I will try to sum it up but ... there is no way to unify it, short
form. I contains very chip-dependent stuff, ranging from the simple
array of longs up to a very complex multi-channel, mult-i devfn,
multi-address, etc. etc. mess.
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070607 19:55]:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:45:30AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I will try to sum it up but ... there is no way to unify it, short
form. I contains very chip-dependent stuff, ranging from the simple
array of longs up to a very complex
I'm fine if somebody wants to work out a MC controller fix.
Weirdly enough, it will look like the device model. But that's ok.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:14:57PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
How does everyone feel abot unions?
Bad. I dont think we need them. (Well if we did, it would be an
idea)
Agreed, if no need then no reason.
I think what we want is a generic MC structure.
Yes, this sounds good.
BUT we
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:25:06AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I'm fine if somebody wants to work out a MC controller fix.
Ah yes - the code. This is where it ended last time too. :p
Weirdly enough, it will look like the device model. But that's ok.
You mean how it is in v2? Is that so wrong
On 6/7/07, Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. It has but they are ordinary pci devices in the tree. we dont
have a tree at raminit time (yet?)
yes, but it hit me that dts can build two trees, one very limited one
for raminit.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070607 21:16]:
On 6/7/07, Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. It has but they are ordinary pci devices in the tree. we dont
have a tree at raminit time (yet?)
yes, but it hit me that dts can build two trees, one very limited one
for raminit.
On 6/7/07, Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah. how would that tree be used?
to describe the device-independent and device-dependent data. To
provide pointers to functions. Pretty much how it is used now.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070607 21:29]:
yeah. how would that tree be used?
to describe the device-independent and device-dependent data. To
provide pointers to functions. Pretty much how it is used now.
Of the memory controller?
So far all that memory init had to do was implement
10 matches
Mail list logo
