On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:04:45AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> does this mean we can not flash while the board is running, or will
> we risk destroying the mainboard even by attempting a flash while
> is is powered off?
Right, this will depend on what the flash is connected to.
> Many memory
* Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070315 23:47]:
> > I think we want to experiment with this to see what we can expect to
> > work. It would be neat, I know it's done in some systems (PS2
> > modchips) but I don't know how well PC chipsets would cope.
>
> Showing my ignorance here, but wouldn't t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:47:18PM +, Paul Millar wrote:
> > > > shared memory between a microcontroler and the motherboard
> > > > (using tristable drivers for arbitrage)
>
> I guess something like three octal bus transceivers (e.g. 75HC245)
> for the logic and something a bit more clever for
On Thursday 15 March 2007 19:37, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > * todthgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 20:37]:
> > > - as a minimum savior like way to update the bios, but much better
> > > is this can be done remote [...] shared memory bet
On 15.03.2007 20:37, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>> Plugging such a microcontroller onto a soldered on flash chip with
>> a plcc piggyback clip or a plcc socket/plug combination would make
>> an additional flash chip unnecessary, and allow t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * todthgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 20:37]:
> > in some time i will start to install it in some machines here
> > starting whit the to be carpc.
> > I'm more a hardware engineer that a software one (but i concider
> > firmware al
* todthgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 20:37]:
> in some time i will start to install it in some machines here starting whit
> the to be carpc.
> I'm more a hardware engineer that a software one (but i concider firmware
> almost hardware;-) )
> and i think i can and maybe will design a (new) devi
a flash 'disk' with a
'bios'
Greetings
Reinder de Haan
The Netherlands
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Stuge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 19:14
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] google support: automatic build reports: HOWT
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> It might be an interesting idea to integrate the bios savior into
> the circuit as well, as IOSS does not produce the bios savior
> anymore.
No doubt the way to go.
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http
* Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 12:52]:
> Slide 13 shows a schematic containing a CP2102. This looks like its accepts
> a
^
The Test Integration Manual goes into more detail than the slides:
http://www.coresystems.de/PDFs/LinuxBIOS-testing/TestIntegrationManual.pdf
> USB connec
Hi Stefan,
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 09:18, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Quux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070313 06:38]:
> > for starters, there is
> > http://www.linuxbios.org/Distributed_and_Automated_Testsystem
> > of course. So, putting together the circuit for remote boot is a
> > requirement, yes ? -
* Quux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070313 06:38]:
> for starters, there is
> http://www.linuxbios.org/Distributed_and_Automated_Testsystem
> of course. So, putting together the circuit for remote boot is a
> requirement, yes ? --Q
Yes, pretty much. If we get a couple of systems for the test system,
w
Quux schrieb:
> can someone knowledgable tell us about those automated build reports on
> mainboards ? how does it work ? greetinx: --Q
for starters, there is
http://www.linuxbios.org/Distributed_and_Automated_Testsystem
of course. So, putting together the circuit for remote boot is a
requir
can someone knowledgable tell us about those automated build reports on
mainboards ? how does it work ? greetinx: --Q
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
14 matches
Mail list logo
