Re: [LinuxBIOS] hdama compile error

2007-10-03 Thread kevint
My initial guess is that we have deployed both revisions, and that we will need both to work. I am verifying with our hardware people. On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:52 PM, yhlu wrote: is it B3 or Rev E Kevin Tegtmeier HPC-3 Scientific Computing

Re: [LinuxBIOS] hdama compile error

2007-10-03 Thread ron minnich
I think a new mainboard target for SATA is safer. They may have rewired IRQs as well. My first reaction before I saw LANL was wow, who has hdama any more?. Then I remembered :-) ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] hdama compile error

2007-10-03 Thread yhlu
On 10/3/07, kevint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correction: Rev C and Rev E Opteron processors. good, we could translate hadma code to CAR based code, please check the serengeti_cheetah... YH -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios