On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:34:52PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:37:30PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On 9/24/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but is it possible to put kexec in the
ROM, too? Yes, it consumes some space, but
On 28/09/07 14:54 -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:34:52PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:37:30PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On 9/24/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but is it possible to put kexec in
On 9/28/07, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. We need a minimal version of
Kconfig for 32bit x86 a ukexec if you will (but please don't use that name).
It can be either tied into Busybox, or stand on its own - I don't really
think it matters.
On 28.09.2007 22:16, ron minnich wrote:
On 9/28/07, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. We need a minimal version of
Kconfig for 32bit x86 a ukexec if you will (but please don't use that name).
It can be either tied into Busybox, or stand on its
Author: ward
Date: 2007-09-25 00:12:17 +0200 (Tue, 25 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 38
Modified:
buildrom-devel/skeleton/bin/boot.functions
Log:
This patch makes sure that specifying an initrd in the LAB config file is
actually respected (that was a bug).
It also moves the LAB config file to
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:12:17AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch makes sure that specifying an initrd in the LAB config file is
actually respected (that was a bug).
It also moves the LAB config file to /lab.conf on the first partition. The
kexec binary is now also expected to
On 9/24/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but is it possible to put kexec in the
ROM, too? Yes, it consumes some space, but I'm curious if it would be
possible.
not stupid at all. On OLPC that's how I did it originally.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
