On 10/10/07 20:23 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Here's the cleaned up version of the XIP/initram patch.
New since the last version:
* It uses the macro suggestion from Jordan
* SHARED-ify post_code()
* use -N during linking initram code to noticably reduce
initram size (drops ~8k of
On 10/10/07, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that this is place, can we figure out why stage2 goes into the
weeds?
once committed, I will try it too.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
I'm thinking to drag out my FS2 -- I think the norwich takes that
connection, right? It ought to be simpler with jtag in place.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071011 17:11]:
On 10/10/07, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r505
Now that this is place, can we figure out why stage2 goes into the
weeds?
What's wrong with stage2? Are you referring to initram or to the
ron minnich wrote:
I'm thinking to drag out my FS2 -- I think the norwich takes that
connection, right? It ought to be simpler with jtag in place.
ron
Yes, the fs2 header is on norwich and will probably help you a lot.
It would be good to know if memory is really working and we fail
will start setup tonight, esp. now that I have a workshop!
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Here's the cleaned up version of the XIP/initram patch.
New since the last version:
* It uses the macro suggestion from Jordan
* SHARED-ify post_code()
* use -N during linking initram code to noticably reduce
initram size (drops ~8k of alignment)
* rename pci_ops FUNC to DEVFUNC to avoid
