Hi Ben,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:36 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> -next and -merge are now both to the same level, which is the same
I think you meant -master (not -merge).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.
Hi Paul, Ben,
Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/Kconfig between commit
4e491d14f2506b218d678935c25a7027b79178b1 ("ftrace: support for PowerPC")
from the ftrace tree and commit 3affedc4e1ce837033b6c5e9289d2ce2f5a62d31
("powerpc/dma: implement new dma_*map*_
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:34 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> It contains 3 branches:
>
> - merge : this is for merging with the current stable and doesn't
> currently contain anything interesting
>
> - master : this is our current "powerpc.git" tree, it may contain
>
Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:26:32PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
Does anyone on this list have contacts with the makers of this board?
Its firmware apparently provides a flattened device tree to the OS.
And while this step towards world domination is flattering, it's an
example
Hi Hans,
>> I propose writing a subsystem driver. (Is that properly called "The
>> SuperIO Bus Driver"?) If no one thinks it's a really bad idea I will
>> put together some code and submit it for review, and maintain it.
>>
>> Some hwmon chips have odd / unique probe sequences. IMHO this is where
Hi Hans, Milton, Jean,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:27:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Hans, hi Milton,
>>>
>>>
> One could make a superio driver, and create sub-d
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 08:32 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Srinivasa D S writes:
>
> > task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is
> > currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for
> > upcoming utrace features.
> > Below attached patch defines th
Srinivasa D S writes:
> task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is
> currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for
> upcoming utrace features.
> Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Please let
> me know your comments on thi
David Hubbard wrote:
Hi Hans, Milton, Jean,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:27:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Hans, hi Milton,
One could make a superio driver, and create sub-dev
Hi,
On Saturday 12 July 2008 20:00:05 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 12 July 2008, Marvin wrote:
> > attached patch introduces a "processor type" menu similar to ppc32. It
> > _should_ not change anything upto now.
> >
> > The aim is to allow future fine graded cpu optimizations via mcpu/mtune
10 matches
Mail list logo
