Hi Linus
And here's the rest of the fixes I was talking about. Hopefully that
should bring back all non-coherent DMA platforms into proper working
conditions. It's a bit invasive so late in the process but it's been
reasonably well tested for a few days.
The following changes since commit
linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode...@ozlabs.org wrote on
27/05/2009 07:08:07:
Guys,
The ucc_geth ethernet driver have dozens of strong sync read/write
operation, such as in_be32/16/8, out_be32/16/8.
all of them is sync read/write, it is very expensive for performance.
For
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Li Yang le...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
Here are fixes for Freescale DMA engine driver.
Thanks,
- Leo
The following changes since commit
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Liu Dave-R63238 dave...@freescale.com wrote:
Guys,
The ucc_geth ethernet driver have dozens of strong sync read/write
operation, such as in_be32/16/8, out_be32/16/8.
all of them is sync read/write, it is very expensive for performance.
Totally agree.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
The function signature for spin_event_timeout() has changed in version V9.
Adjust the mpc5200 AC97 driver to use the new function.
v2 - switch back to udelay() for fixed timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com
Michael Ellerman wrote:
+ root = of_find_node_by_path(/);
+ if (root) {
+ perf_level = of_get_property(root,
+ ibm,partition-performance-parameters-level,
+NULL);
What if there is no such
This patch updates the output from /proc/ppc64/lparcfg to display the
processor virtualization resource allocations for a shared processor
partition.
This information is already gathered via the h_get_ppp call, we just
have to make sure that the ibm,partition-performance-parameters-level
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
ioremap_early() is useful for things like mapping SoC internally registers
and early debug output because it allows mappings to devices to be setup
early in the boot process where they are needed. It also give a
performance boost since BAT mapped
On May 22, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
BTW do you need swiotlb_bus_to_virt to be __weak or is the fact that
it
is implemented in terms of swiotlb_bus_to_phys sufficient?
The default one in swiotlb calls phys_to_virt on the result of
swiotlb_bus_to_phys, which only works on
On May 22, 2009, at 5:51 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009 13:18:54 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge jer...@goop.org wrote:
Becky Bruce wrote:
I can work with that, but it's going to be a bit inefficient, as I
actually need the dma_addr_t, not the phys_addr_t, so I'll have to
convert.
On May 26, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 19:55 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:27 -0400, Becky Bruce wrote:
I can work with that, but it's going to be a bit inefficient, as I
actually need the dma_addr_t, not the
Hi all:
Am 25.05.09 23:47 schrieb(en) Wolfram Sang:
A word or long copy of 0x0055aaff with U-Boot works fine, but a byte
copy filled the whole ram with 0x. The reason is apparently
that the chip is attached to the local bus in 16-bit mode, which is
incompatible with byte accesses.
This trivial patch changes memcpy_(to|from)io as to transfer as many
32-bit words as possible in 32-bit accesses (in the current solution,
the last 32-bit word was transferred as 4 byte accesses).
Signed-off-by: Albrecht Dreß albrecht.dr...@arcor.de
---
diff -urpN -X
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:05 -0400, Becky Bruce wrote:
On May 22, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
BTW do you need swiotlb_bus_to_virt to be __weak or is the fact that
it
is implemented in terms of swiotlb_bus_to_phys sufficient?
The default one in swiotlb calls phys_to_virt on
On May 27, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:05 -0400, Becky Bruce wrote:
On May 22, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
BTW do you need swiotlb_bus_to_virt to be __weak or is the fact that
it
is implemented in terms of swiotlb_bus_to_phys sufficient?
The
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:41 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
This patch updates the output from /proc/ppc64/lparcfg to display the
processor virtualization resource allocations for a shared processor
partition.
This information is already gathered via the h_get_ppp call, we just
have to make
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Albrecht Dreß albrecht.dr...@arcor.de wrote:
Hi all:
Am 25.05.09 23:47 schrieb(en) Wolfram Sang:
A word or long copy of 0x0055aaff with U-Boot works fine, but a byte copy
filled the whole ram with 0x. The reason is apparently that the
chip is
On Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:43 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This is going to .30 if nobody hollers. I've done some testing here
and it seems to be fine, but more eyes at this stage are much welcome.
Sigh, I didn't get a chance to look at this until tonight. I use
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Sean MacLennan smaclen...@pikatech.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:43 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This is going to .30 if nobody hollers. I've done some testing here
and it seems to be fine, but more eyes at this stage are
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 23:34 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:43 +1000
../..
You can just make it a platform device I suppose. In the meantime...
Maybe set ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD somewhere? Some platforms seem to set it:
./platforms/52xx/efika.c: ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD =
On Thu, 28 May 2009 13:52:29 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Can't you set ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD = ~0L from your warp.c platform file ?
I actually set it in the driver proper since it is faster to test, but
it works. I am just wondering how kosher that is.
The
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 00:11 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 13:52:29 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Can't you set ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD = ~0L from your warp.c platform file ?
I actually set it in the driver proper since it is faster to test, but
Ben,
Any comments on this.. need a decision so we can have patches ready
for .31.
- k
On May 19, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On May 18, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 08:25 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Part of this is how the generic swiotlb
On Wed, 27 May 2009 21:42:18 -0600
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
Make your driver use a platform device or an of_platform device. It's
not at all hard.
Here is my first shot any other fields that I need to fill in so I
don't have any gotchas?
/* This must exist */
static
24 matches
Mail list logo
