On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 21 June 2009, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:56:45 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> > > The fact that your bisect ended at a merge essentially means that it
> > > is invalid. As a merge does not introduce any actual change (unless
> > >
hello all:
I encountered a very strange question, I am using the AMCC Powerpc 405ep its
Emac0 received a single phy intel 971, Emac1 received RTL8305SB, they shared
Mdio, Mdc. 2.6.25.10 I use the kernel.
The problem is to use the following command will be eth0, eth1 configured
bridge
On Sunday 21 June 2009, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> I found the source of the badness. The backtrace is correct:
>
> uic_init_one
So that's in arch/powerpc/sysdev/uic.c.
> ___alloc_bootmem
> ___alloc_bootmem_nopanic
> alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem
>
> In alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem we have:
>
>
On Sunday 21 June 2009, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:56:45 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> > The fact that your bisect ended at a merge essentially means that it
> > is invalid. As a merge does not introduce any actual change (unless
> > it includes changes to resolve conflicts), it nor
> The git bisect returned:
>
> 871fa90791a6f83dd8e2e489feb9534a8c02088d is first bad commit
>
> That is it, no more info strange. git show 8714...088d gives:
>
> Merge: 7702667... 79f52b7...
> Author: Linus Torvalds
> Date: Thu Jun 11 11:27:09 2009 -0700
>
> The Warp has jfs disabled, so I
I found the source of the badness. The backtrace is correct:
uic_init_one
___alloc_bootmem
___alloc_bootmem_nopanic
alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem
In alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem we have:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(slab_is_available()))
return kzalloc(size, GFP_NOWAIT);
Since the sl
Remove duplicated #include('s) in
arch/powerpc/kernel/mpc7450-pmu.c
arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc970-pmu.c
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/mpc7450-pmu.c |1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc970-pmu.c |1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powe
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:56:45 +0200
Frans Pop wrote:
> The fact that your bisect ended at a merge essentially means that it
> is invalid. As a merge does not introduce any actual change (unless
> it includes changes to resolve conflicts), it normally cannot be the
> cause of a regression.
Makes s
[0.00] [ cut here ]
[0.00] Badness at c033ebc4 [verbose debug info unavailable]
[0.00] NIP: c033ebc4 LR: c033eb94 CTR:
[0.00] REGS: c037fe70 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.30-pika)
[0.00] MSR: 00021000 CR: 22022024 XER: 000
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:44:01 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 01:57 +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> > I found configuration, where there isn't delay, but I need more
> > time for testing.
I switched to 2.6.30 and found that CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE option
takes influen
I have a ppc405 based board with one serial interface which I use as a
console.
I would like to redirect or suppress, at run time, the console in order to
use the
serial port to control external serial devices.
I have tried (busybox) setconsole program to redirect the console to
/dev/null
but it
Hi Michael,
> This happen because though the wait_event_interruptible_timeout takes the
> signals into account, the driver does not handle them.
> We propose to change the wait_event_interruptible_timeout with
> wait_event_timeout, leaving the signals to be handled in other points
> on the upper l
Remove duplicated #include in arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/xes_mpc85xx.c.
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/xes_mpc85xx.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/xes_mpc85xx.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/xes_
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I think it would be nice to have more platform support in .31.
> > Perfcounters is a brand-new feature so there's no risk of
> > regression. In the end it will depend on Linus to pull of course,
> > an
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
That is strange. If I revert that commit, I get breakages on machines
here. It would be interesting to understand what the problem is here,
as we -do- use that kmem cache for allocating page tables, so we do
need it initialized that early. (IE, we can't allow vmalloc
15 matches
Mail list logo