On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:00 +0100
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:35 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I don't think that we need to take account of dom0 support; we don't
> > have a clear idea about an acceptable dom0 design (it needs to use
> > swiotlb code? I don't know yet), w
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:12:48 +0200
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > functionality and reimplemented the surrounding infrastructure in
> > terms of that (and incorporating our additional requirements). I
> > prototyped this (it is currently unworking, in fact it seems to
> > have developed rather a taste
From: Julia Lawall
The result of container_of should not be NULL. In particular, in this case
the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_WORK, which
dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change