On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 20:20 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
I don't see any reason to limit it to GPL drivers. Not only that, but
then we'll have this:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Kumar Gala kumar.g...@freescale.com wrote:
I don't think either of these should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Why shouldn't a
binary module be allowed to know these frequencies? My view is why preclude
anyone from using this how they want. If they want to live in
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kumar Gala kumar.g...@freescale.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 20:20 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
I don't see any
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
It is not, in my opinion, about what is technically possible and what
isn't. The kernel is licensed under the GPL. This is a Linux kernel
only symbol. One would be hard pressed to claim they
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
This is a new symbol being exported, not
one that has been exported for years.
Except that Ben says that I should change ppc_proc_freq from EXPORT_SYMBOL
to
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL as well. In a
On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kumar Gala kumar.g...@freescale.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17
Dear tma...@apm.com,
In message 1284774145-14543-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com you wrote:
This patch generalizes the existing drver/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c, so that
common code can be shared between different similar DMA engine
drivers in other SoCs.
...
* This driver supports the
Dear tma...@apm.com,
In message 1284774162-14652-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com you wrote:
From: Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com
This patch combines drivers/dma/ppc4xx/xor.h and driver/dma/dma/ppc4xx/dma.h
into drivers/dma/ppc4xx/ppx440spe-dma.h .
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
Josh Boyer wrote:
It is not, in my opinion, about what is technically possible and what
isn't. The kernel is licensed under the GPL. This is a Linux kernel
only symbol. One would be hard pressed to claim they have a driver
that wasn't written for Linux that happens to need that symbol. As
Josh Boyer wrote:
This is a new symbol being exported, not
one that has been exported for years.
Except that Ben says that I should change ppc_proc_freq from EXPORT_SYMBOL to
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL as well. In a sense, we're in a catch-22. We have three
choices:
1. We *arbitrarily* change
Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:58:41 +0800
tiejun.chen tiejun.c...@windriver.com wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
The guest OS *is* the same as native Linux, as far as TLB handling is
concerned.
Looks you means the TLB exception handler should be same between the native
and
the guest
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 10:34 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 20:20 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
I don't see any reason to limit it to
12 matches
Mail list logo
