On Nov 13, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Is there any reason we shouldn't set DMA_BIT_MASK(64) since the DMA block
programming model allows the address to be 64-bits?
Can you explain that? The DMA
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
The programming model (if you look at the free-space in the registers and
data structures) supports a 64-bit address. I'm trying to avoid changing the
driver in the future if we have 36-bit. However this is such a
Information about the pagesize and read-only-status may also come from
the devicetree. Parse this data, too, and act accordingly. While we are
here, change the initialization printout a bit. write_max is useful to
know to detect performance bottlenecks, the rest is superfluous.
Signed-off-by:
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts |1 +
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm032.dts |3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts
index 8a4ec30..e7c36bc
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:25:16PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts |1 +
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm032.dts |3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
The programming model (if you look at the free-space in the registers and
data structures) supports a 64-bit address. I'm trying to avoid changing
the driver in
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:43:12 -0600
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
The programming model (if you look at the free-space in the registers and
From: Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com
This patch adds MSI support for 440SPe, 460Ex, 460Sx and 405Ex.
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri tma...@apm.com
---
v1:
* Get rid of bitmap functions.
* Remove irq mapping as each MSI is tied to UIC.
* Cleaning up of prints.
v2:
* Remove or add blank
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Information about the pagesize and read-only-status may also come from
the devicetree. Parse this data, too, and act accordingly. While we are
here, change the initialization printout a bit. write_max is useful to
know
In general I think it's better to report parameter values directly,
instead of inferring them from manufacturer and part numbers. That way
you at least have a fighting chance of avoiding a kernel upgrade when a
part changes.
Of course, that only works when the device tree is exported from
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:17:51PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
In general I think it's better to report parameter values directly,
instead of inferring them from manufacturer and part numbers. That
way you at least have a fighting chance of avoiding a kernel upgrade
when a part changes.
I
-Original Message-
From: Bounine, Alexandre [mailto:alexandre.boun...@idt.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 12:30 AM
To: Xie Shaohui-B21989; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; Li Yang-R58472; Gala Kumar-B11780; Zang
Roy-R61911
Subject: RE: [PATCH][v3]
In message 1289520464.4752.12.ca...@localhost you wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:06 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 11:54 -0800, Jim Keniston wrote:
I got Ben's linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git source and built it
(.config file attached*). It hangs on boot.
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 12:10 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
The ams driver isn't a hardware monitoring driver, so it shouldn't
live under driver/hwmon. drivers/macintosh seems much more
appropriate, as the driver is only useful on PowerBooks and iBooks.
Going through backlog... Do you want me to
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Dirk Brandewie
dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:01:20PM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dirk Brandewiedirk.brande...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for linking device tree
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Dirk Brandewie
dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/2010 09:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Dirk Brandewie
dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:01:20PM
On 11/15/2010 09:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Dirk Brandewie
dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:01:20PM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dirk Brandewiedirk.brande...@gmail.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
